I think we found the solution ourselves: Our *-ds.xml files (e.g. this one)
were missing the element:
After adding it, it looks now much better :-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4107595#4107595
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index
Hello *,
I've a problem with a RA: Even though the ra.xml says
XATransaction
my resource seems to be handled as if it was only local-tx, which leads to
exceptions:
2007-11-24 22:01:18,165 WARN [com.arjuna.ats.jta.logging.loggerI18N]
[com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.transaction.arjunacore.enlistst
Yabbadabbado!!! It's working again!!!
My client-interceptor checks now, whether the returned Proxy is already tagged
with other user-data. If yes, I clone it via serialization and deserialization.
The user thus gets a clone which is tagged correctly and everything seems to
work fine.
But this
After some further investigation, I saw sth. very interesting:
| EjbOfPartnerHome home1 =
EjbOfPartnerUtil.getHome(getInitCtxProps(partner1));
| EjbOfPartner ejbOfPartner1 = home1.create();
| EjbOfPartnerHome home2 =
EjbOfPartnerUtil.getHome(getInitCtxProps(partner2));
| EjbOfPartner ejb
Hello *,
in our use case, quite a few EJB methods (mostly of stateless session beans)
need to communicate with many EJBs on different servers (some on the same
server, but then mostly still as different user). Therefore, we want to stick
the authentication info to the EJBs, making code like thi
Hello wolfc,
thanks a lot for your quick and very helpful reply!!! It works!
I know that it's bad to turn on this option, but I need it for a development
system (when we'll go productive, there will be solely xa-resources).
For other readers browsing this thread, here a short summary:
I edited
"wolfc" wrote : [...] It is possible to set a property in the transaction
service to allow multiple one phase resources, but that could lead to
transaction problems. [...]
Hello wolfc,
I upgraded from 4.0.4.GA to 4.2.0.GA and I now have the same problem. After
having read your response, I start
Hello Tom,
thanks a lot for your quick reply! I built a test case and hope you can either
tell me what I'm doing wrong or fix the bug in jBPM ;-)
This is my test process definition:
http://www.nightlabs.de/~marco/jbpm/2006-12-18.00/processimage.jpg
Here is a little test application (incl. the
Hello *,
I've got a question about Fork+Join behaviour:
When the root token enters the Fork, it creates a new child token for every
outgoing transition. That's exactly what I expected according to the docs and
my intuition.
When these child tokens enter the Join, however, they don't end there,
Hello genman,
thanks a lot for the clarification!
After some further research, I stumbled over
http://www.odi.ch/weblog/posting.php?posting=210
Your hint and that document in conjunction with
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=ConfigJBossMQDB solved my problem.
Now, it seems to be worki
Hello *,
I would like to achieve the following behaviour:
A session bean's method is called within a transaction and sends a message to a
queue. The message should, however, not be delivered before the transaction is
complete, because otherwise the data in my database is not yet visible to my
11 matches
Mail list logo