[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: Scheduled TaskInstances within a ProcessInstance?

2007-03-25 Thread perrylucas
Ok - you should be able to find a mini tutorial here now: http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=CustomTasks (Linked from the jbpm home wiki page under jbpm 3) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4031430#4031430 Reply to the post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: Scheduled TaskInstances within a ProcessInstance?

2007-03-23 Thread perrylucas
Hmm, yeah I guess that makes sense... for some reason I had it set in my mind that since all the task instances for a process instance weren't created from the get go, that I wasn't going to be able to plan ahead, but obviously the process definition itself could be accessed runtime! Thanks

[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: Scheduled TaskInstances within a ProcessInstance?

2007-03-23 Thread perrylucas
it seems like a common thing to want to be able to do... for now i have tried adding the attributes i need to Task and that seems to be working well. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4031251#4031251 Reply to the post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Scheduled TaskInstances within a ProcessInstance?

2007-03-22 Thread perrylucas
Our company is considering JBPM as a replacement for our current workflow management software (built in-house), but it seems to be missing a vital piece! Here's the scenario: We need to assign several stateful properties, including Estimated Man Hours, Actual Man Hours, Due Date, etc to our

[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: deployment in JBoss

2007-03-22 Thread perrylucas
Continual Improvement is one of the main benefits you achieve by having a BPM, right? So, I'd say that the deployment and redeployment of process definitions should be encouraged in production, not just during development! View the original post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: JBPM Documentation wanted - PDF, Word ( anything we can

2007-03-21 Thread perrylucas
ok, what you need to do is actually download the version of JBPM that you're insterested in using, and look for the single page userguide. For version jbpm-jpdl-3.2.GA, you can find this in the \doc\userguide\html_single folder. Be sure to open the html_single version of the user guide unless

[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: How to build 3.2-ga from source?

2007-03-20 Thread perrylucas
Yes, don't rely on maven to build from source as it isn't being supported currently. You'll find that the build is very maven-like anyways as it will set up a local repository and gather up all the dependencies for you. You will have to define a class variable named JBPM_REPO within eclipse

[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - jbpm-console from cvs

2007-03-20 Thread perrylucas
While trying to help another user this morning to build jbpm3-2 from source, i was trying to deploy the jbpm-console web app that i retreived from CVS. I set my JBPm_REPO and ran install which successfully downloaded all the libs needed to compile the project. I changed the version of my

[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: Java 5 dependency a problem for Web Console ?

2007-03-03 Thread perrylucas
Integration with Java 5 is of utmost importance IMO. We need to get tighter integration with SEAM! SEAM is getting a lot of attention right now and so now is the time to either branch JBPM to port 1.5 or just declare the change as part of the roadmap. With all of the attention, people are

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Query By Example in Seam

2007-01-29 Thread perrylucas
So I was looking around Hibernate's API and found the QBE bit which seems to be handy for simple queries. I then wondered how I could go about something similar in Seam. I didn't want to open up my own Hibernate Session and consequently manage that Session, so I came up with a little utility

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Query By Example in Seam

2007-01-29 Thread perrylucas
ok, for readers' reference, here's a link to the feature request: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBSEAM-714 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4007956#4007956 Reply to the post :