[jboss-user] [EJB 3.0] - Re: Possibility to test passivation / activation of SFSB

2008-09-12 Thread sebgerpb
Many thanks, Francesco. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4176167#4176167 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4176167 ___ jboss-user mailing list

[jboss-user] [EJB 3.0] - Possibility to test passivation / activation of SFSB

2008-09-10 Thread sebgerpb
Hi everyone, is there a possibility to test passivation and activation of a SFSB via a unit-test or something like that? I read in the forums that EJB3 Embeddable does not support passivation of EJBs. Is there any other way to do this? Thanks for your answers! View the original post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Session invalidation on JAAS logout

2008-05-16 Thread sebgerpb
Hi, I wrote a custom login module which I use to authenticate an user against a remote server. I have overridden the login and logout-methods with my own code. Both work correctly. The only thing I do not unterstand is, why the sessions of my portlets do not get invalidated. If I login to my

[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Re: Custom Login Module - Login Link

2008-05-14 Thread sebgerpb
I further investigated this issue. It seems to me like this has something to do with using a custom principal in the custom login module. If I override the commit()-method of AbstractServerLoginModule and only return true, JBoss Security Manager doesnt make use of my custom principal, but I can

[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Re: Custom Login Module - Login Link

2008-05-14 Thread sebgerpb
Hi ai77, if I unterstand the docs correctly, the synchronization of the two databases can be done by the SynchronizingLoginModule (at least for the JBoss part). It is described here:

[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Re: Custom Login Module - Login Link

2008-05-13 Thread sebgerpb
Hi ai77, I have the same problem. Did you solve this one in the meantime? If yes, can you tell me how to fix it? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4150330#4150330 Reply to the post :