np. ur welcome.
JbossCache doesn't exclude the use of a database. The question is... the exact
use of each. For example, database can be used only for persistence in case of
a general power failure or system restart, but not for failover. Don't forget
that if you use a non High Availability clu
Hi dmary. Actually I found a solution to this and implemented the project. I ll
need to dig a bit as its 2 years old now, to find the specific chunks of code
you are interested in. I hope i send em to you some time tomorrow.
As far as the fail over behaviour, provider and manager are instantiate
worked just fine! can execute 4000 tasks in 40 secs with 2secs max delay :)
with Sun's jmx timer the delay would reach 50 secs!
I would never have discovered this implementation difference without ur help
thx again.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic
The Scheduler works like that:
It has a timer on which it subsribes filtered listeners. When the timer
triggers, the appropriate listener catches the event and calls the predefined
target class or mbean with some certain parameters. What you really want if i
understood right, is to have your ap
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : Are you on jdk5? Have you tried jdk1.4?
why should i use 1.4? as far as i know jboss uses the jmx libraries previously
included in J2ee and now included in jdk1.5.
btw i am from greece too dimitris :P
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=b
#x27;s bad performance that degrades the whole system's performance.
I could use some advise here.
thx in advance.
TheHunt.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3999437#3999437
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?mo
I found the following definition for target method argument of the
SimpleScheduleProvider. Should be the same for the other providers as well.
Target Method
Defines the method on the Target that is invoked by the Manager when a
timed notification is handled. It starts with
Hi,
There is a detail of the ScheduleManager implementation that troubles me.
I ll give u a short description of what I want to do.
I want to run a ScheduleManager + Provider as a Singleton in a cluster. A
client will be able to register schedules on the provider from any node on the
cluster
Great posts! I got some questions though.
Why deploy the singleton sar on all nodes and not place it in /farm directory
on one node as Ivanov describes in his article?
And finally, isnt possible instead of using the RMI adaptor to use the HA_JNDI
cluster wide tree? I mean MBeanServer is ofc no
Ok sorry for my haste. Just noticed markfrench's post below. I guess it touches
the same problem. I ll try the HA-JNDI approach and let you know.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3961862#3961862
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.h
Hi all,
I want to control an MBean service through its API. This Service will be either
the JMX Timer or the JBoss Scheduler. To control it, I ll have to access it
through the MBeanServer. In a clustered environment where I have declared the
service to run as singleton I am gonna have the servi
Yes u understood just fine. thx alot for the info. Really appreciate it.
I guess that the right spot to place the code accessing the MBean must be a
POJO class which will be used in my Session Beans?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3961851#396
Hi all,
I am relatively new to Jboss and I am making a huge effort the last month to
get to now everything for a university project. I would like your help
regarding the problem below :
I want to use the Jboss Scheduler as Singleton to register events in a
clustered setup. These events will pl
13 matches
Mail list logo
