[jboss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Re: role of port bindings xml

2008-03-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can see who the members of a cluster are by looking at the jboss:service=DefaultPartition mbean in jmx-console. Except, replace "DefaultPartition" with whatever you set with -g. Re: your JMS issue, I'm guessing someone is looking up a ConnectionFactory from the wrong cluster; i.e. a config

[jboss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Re: role of port bindings xml

2008-03-20 Thread navjeetc
BTW this test was performed on Windows Server 2003. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4138150#4138150 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4138150 ___ jb

[jboss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Re: role of port bindings xml

2008-03-20 Thread navjeetc
I have setup the clusters and I am passing -c, -b, -g and -u parameters (with unique values for the clusters) in the run script. I am using JMS to send message from one cluster to another and it is picked up by the third cluster also. I am using a JMS bridge for that and assuming (I think that i

[jboss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Re: role of port bindings xml

2008-03-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you look at the jboss-service.xml mbean where you set ports-01, etc, there's a "StoreURL" attribute: | | ports-01 | ${jboss.home.url}/docs/examples/binding-manager/sample-bindings.xml | |org.jboss.services.binding.XMLServicesStoreFactory | | T

[jboss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Re: role of port bindings xml

2008-03-19 Thread navjeetc
Thanks for that info, Brian. Is there any resource online that can provide info on what settings in which files (e.g. cluster-service.xml, hajndi-jms-ds.xml etc.) are being overridden when one specifies port setting (ports-default, ports-01 etc.) in jboss-service.xml. There seems to be ports

[jboss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] - Re: role of port bindings xml

2008-03-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, it is not. The JGroups channels in nodes meant to be part of different clusters will be listening on the same multicast addresses and ports and will thus see each others traffic. The use of -Djboss.partition.name will prevent that traffic from getting out the JGroups channel, but you still