[jboss-user] [EJB/JBoss] - Re: set TransactionTimeout during Runtime

2009-05-29 Thread sams2100
Have you considered breaking up your EJB into two EJBs joined via a JMS queue? Basically have the first EJB generate the messages for the web service, and as it generates say 100 web service requests, it tosses those requests onto a queue instead of making those requests itself. Then have

[jboss-user] [EJB/JBoss] - Re: set TransactionTimeout during Runtime

2009-05-28 Thread bolbit
Hey mclu, sorry, but I have no solution. I raised the Transaction Timeout for the EJB Method sending the messages and accept that sometimes the method will be aborted because of a timeout. In order to avoid the rollback of the successfuly sended messages I use an EJB Method to send one single

[jboss-user] [EJB/JBoss] - Re: set TransactionTimeout during Runtime

2009-05-26 Thread mclu
Have you solved it? I have a similar issue but I don't want to increase the timeout for the 97% mainstream handling like you Greets View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4233281#4233281 Reply to the post :