[jboss-user] [EJB 3.0] - Re: BMT does not work the expected way.

2007-07-30 Thread wolfc
>From the same paragraph: anonymous wrote : In less common use cases within Java EE environments, applications may need to access a persistence context that is ?stand-alone??i.e. not propagated along with the JTA transaction across the EntityManager references for the given persistence unit. |

[jboss-user] [EJB 3.0] - Re: BMT does not work the expected way.

2007-07-30 Thread waynebaylor
"Technically" it just needs to support the EntityManager, not the method of retrieving it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4068718#4068718 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4068718 ___

[jboss-user] [EJB 3.0] - Re: BMT does not work the expected way.

2007-07-30 Thread sumantkb
Hi Thanks for the response. Please look at 5.1 , second last paragraph. It says "Both container-managed entity managers and application-managed entity managers and their persistence contexts are required to be supported in Java EE web containers and EJB containers. " Would not that imply that

[jboss-user] [EJB 3.0] - Re: BMT does not work the expected way.

2007-07-26 Thread waynebaylor
>From the EJB3 Persistence spec (section 5.3, page 116) it says to use: EntityManagerFactory emf = | javax.persistence.Persistence.createEntityManagerFactory("Order"); | EntityManager em = emf.createEntityManager(); when working in a Java SE environment. When working in an EE container use in