Ok, I see :)
low prio is fine with me, there's an easy 'workaround' after all. The class
definition is clearer like that anyway. And the error message also points
directly to the problem.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3983448#3983448
Reply to
anonymous wrote : EJB3 4.6.2 4th bullet:
| The class must implement the bean?s business interface(s) or the methods of
the bean?s business interface(s), if any.
|
It doesn't say anything about super classes. Although I also like the
construction you used mindhaq I won't consider this a bug.
Thank you for your quick reply. Could you please post an answer to this thread
as soon as this is fixed in CVS, so I'll now it's going to be in the next
release?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3983159#3983159
Reply to the post :
http://www.jb
I've also observed this, and I believe it to be a bug in JBoss EJB3.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3983157#3983157
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3983157
__
