[jboss-user] [JBoss AOP] - Re: Is there a static vs. dynamic binding problem with jboss

2006-10-09 Thread stalep
this problem is now fixed, it was a bug in javassist. the fix is atm only available from the javassist cvs repository, but the upcoming jboss-aop 2.0 will include this fix. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3977088#3977088 Reply to the post : ht

[jboss-user] [JBoss AOP] - Re: Is there a static vs. dynamic binding problem with jboss

2006-09-05 Thread stalep
hi, a simple workaround for the fieldproblem is to either to rename the field variable so that it doesnt match the field of the subclass or make the field variable private accessible. the only workaround for the overflow/loop problem is to rename one of the methods calling. i'll make a post when

[jboss-user] [JBoss AOP] - Re: Is there a static vs. dynamic binding problem with jboss

2006-08-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This seems like a bug, I am currently busy trying to get AOP 2.0 alpha ready, but will try to get this in before then. http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAOP-284 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3968397#3968397 Reply to the post : http://www

[jboss-user] [JBoss AOP] - Re: Is there a static vs. dynamic binding problem with jboss

2006-08-29 Thread manu4ever
Actually I was wrong to say that it was reading SUBPOJO.field. It's actually reading POJO.field. The problem is that when I try to write to SUBPOJO.field, the code is rewritten by jboss AOP in such a way that it writes to POJO.field instead. The problem seems to be the mechanism used to interc