[jboss-user] [JBoss Cache: Core Edition] - Re: Lock timeout exceptions

2008-06-11 Thread ajassal
You are right. We are using INVALIDATION_SYNC. I think for now I will switch over to using REPL_[A]SYNC instead and plan to upgrade to 2.x later. Thanks View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4157533#4157533 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/

[jboss-user] [JBoss Cache: Core Edition] - Re: Lock timeout exceptions

2008-06-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I see where you got the idea about eviction from. :-) I assume your cache is configured for INVALIDATION_SYNC or INVALIDATION_ASYNC. Seems in 1.x the cluster wide invalidation was implemented by telling the other nodes to do an evict. And that means the call uses the 0 ms timeout meant for reg

[jboss-user] [JBoss Cache: Core Edition] - Re: Lock timeout exceptions

2008-06-11 Thread ajassal
Brian, Thanks. Here you go: INFO 2008-06-11 18:50:34,071 UpHandler (GMS) U- org.jboss.cache.interceptors.TxInterceptor - There was a problem handling this request org.jboss.cache.lock.TimeoutException: failure acquiring lock: fqn=/user/id, caller=Thread[UpHandler (GMS),5,JGroups threads], l

[jboss-user] [JBoss Cache: Core Edition] - Re: Lock timeout exceptions

2008-06-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please post the entire stack trace. It's not eviction, as eviction isn't handled by the JGroups UpHandler thread. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4157465#4157465 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=repl