:-) If you can prove to me that it doesn't do so - perhaps by way of a more
focused and specific test - I'll look into a fix and a release.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4161124#4161124
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?mod
Yeah, as you say, "it hould".
We'll investigate a little deeper. Thanks,
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4161120#4161120
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4161120
_
anonymous wrote :
| Using a remove(Fqn).
|
Doing a remove should remove events from an eviction queue as well.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=416#416
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode
Using a remove(Fqn).
As we don`t have a cache loader configured for this cache, we could probably do
an evict, but since we have done our own abstraction on top of JBossCache for
our way of doing things, we have chosen to use remove so it works with any
underlying JBossCache.
CacheEviction is
How does your scheduler job remove stuff? Using a remove() or an evict()?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4160809#4160809
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4160809
__
