[jboss-user] [JBoss Cache: Core Edition] - Re: Transactions Created On Reads Holding Up Writers ???

2009-08-06 Thread manik.surt...@jboss.com
Hi, sorry for the late response. 1) Red Hat does offer paid support for JBoss Cache as a part of the JBoss EAP subscription. 2) Interesting that using the dummy TM solves the problem - it is still a real TM capable of holding real locks. It's just that other components in the app server won'

[jboss-user] [JBoss Cache: Core Edition] - Re: Transactions Created On Reads Holding Up Writers ???

2009-08-05 Thread snacker
According to the "MVCCLockManager" api: (http://www.jboss.org/file-access/default/members/jbosscache/freezone/docs/3.1.0.CR1/apidocs/org/jboss/cache/lock/MVCCLockManager.html anonymous wrote : Boss Cache's MVCC design doesn't use read locks at all. Really? Then why are the writers waiting for

[jboss-user] [JBoss Cache: Core Edition] - Re: Transactions Created On Reads Holding Up Writers ???

2009-07-23 Thread snacker
If we change the EJB to @TransactionAttribute(value=TransactionAttributeType.NEVER), then we can use the GenericTransactionManager and it prevents the lockups. So, why is it locking on a read? Also, since this cache is supposed to persist until explicitly removed we've commented the node. Ot

[jboss-user] [JBoss Cache: Core Edition] - Re: Transactions Created On Reads Holding Up Writers ???

2009-07-23 Thread snacker
BTW we are using "JBossCache 'Cascabel' 3.1.0.GA" View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4245679#4245679 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4245679 ___ jboss