Locking it
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048032#4048032
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048032
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jbo
This thread is a dupe of
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=109165
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048031#4048031
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048031
_
ok set-up didnt appear quite as i was hoping but heres another go
jboss.messaging:service=ServerPeer
jboss.messaging:service=PostOffice
< attribute name="RedeliveryDelay">3
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4046850#4046850
Hi Guys,
I know its been a month since you all had this conversation, i was wondering if
anyone ever got this to work. I downloaded Version 1.2.0sp1 yesterday and dont
seem to be able to get the redelivery delay to work. I have posted my setup for
the queue below.
Anyone have any ideas???
1.2.0 will go GA tomorrow.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4023392#4023392
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4023392
___
jboss-user mailing list
jbo
1.2.0 will go GA tomorrow.
imaeses wrote:
Hi Tim,
Thanks for the reply. Here's my problem: we aren't prepared to roll the 1.2
version into production because it's not a general release yet. We'd prefer to
use the 1.0.1 version since it is stable. However, this one feature is quite
important
Hi Tim,
Thanks for the reply. Here's my problem: we aren't prepared to roll the 1.2
version into production because it's not a general release yet. We'd prefer to
use the 1.0.1 version since it is stable. However, this one feature is quite
important.
Are you planning on enabling this feature i
"imaeses" wrote :
|
| Therefore, I ask again: is it possible in JBoss Messaging to configure the
message redelivery delay?
|
|
In 1.2, yes, in 1.0.1, no.
Have a look at the destination and server peer mbean config.
Queue/Topic:
|
| The delay before redelivering
|
Perhaps it would be helpful to explain *why* the delay is necessary. Again, the
current situation is that if a message is delivered to an MDB and the
transaction is rolled back, the message is immediately and repeatedly
redelivered until the maximum amount of times has been reached.
We have two
Thanks for your reply. I see that MDBConfig in the proxy-factory-config for the
invoker proxy takes precedence. However, I still see no way to configure the
*delay* between message redeliveries. Is this still possible to configure?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module
The MDB container / JCA layer also has its own DLQ - this is configured
(normally) in standard-jboss.xml.
This will take precedence over the jboss messaging DLQ - you would need to turn
this off, or maybe you want to use it.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&o
Absolutely, thanks.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3982845#3982845
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3982845
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user
If it is in fact the JMS/JCA adapter being used (this would be with EJB3RC9)
let me know. There were some things added to support EJB3 that may be an issue.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3982844#3982844
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.c
Thanks.
I've scheduled it for 1.0.2.CR1. I'll try to take a look at the test case ASAP,
and I'll get back to you on this thread if I have further questions.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3982843#3982843
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss
Hi guys.
I can confirm that problem exists only when I use EJB3 MDB.
Jboss is 4.0.5.GA with ejb3 implementation that came with it. :-)
all the configuration is default(only what messaging install changed it)
I have created a simple test case that i attached to issue
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/b
We also have to find out what version of JBoss (unless I missed it) as well as
RC* candidate of EJB3. Both are important in terms of JCA being used at all.
Transaction attributes would be good to know as well.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=39
H.
This
anonymous wrote :
| ERROR [MessageCallbackHandler] RuntimeException was thrown from onMessage,
90625 will be redelivered
|
Tells me that the JCA layer/MDB container is *not* calling onMessage directly
(since this is logged from JBM), therefore JMS semantics do apply, and we n
Hi guys,
I have been out for little holidays
I am using EJB3. And I will make some simple test case when I come to office
tomorrow.
If you think that ejb 2.1 would behave behave differently I can try that also.
cheers,
tomaz
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?modu
Apologies - my head is in JMS world :)
If the JCA layer calls the message listener directly in the case of a JMS MDB,
and handles the redelivery itself then this is really a question for Weston,
not a JMS question, n'est ce pas?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=b
anonymous wrote :
| If a RuntimeException is thrown then redelivery should occur - this is
mandated in the JMS spec 1.1, section 4.5.2.
|
Sort of. As Ovidiu points out, this is a bit different situation if he is using
MDBs. This is one gray area where the JMS spec and the EJB spec are not
There is something I don't understand here, please forgive my intrusion:
Tomaz says that he uses MDBs. The RuntimeException is thrown from within MDB's
onMessage().
4.5.2 is about MessageListener's onMessage(), and actually the session's
acknowledgment mode has bearing on the behavior. This is
"ctomc" wrote :
| I know that resending because of exception in onMessage is not part of JMS
spec but as far as I know jboss messaging(and mq) support this behavior.
If a RuntimeException is thrown then redelivery should occur - this is mandated
in the JMS spec 1.1, section 4.5.2.
If this is
22 matches
Mail list logo
