I am moving this thread to "Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)"
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4027235#4027235
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4027235
___
Hiya Tim.
The server side issue is with Messaging :-)
The ServerSessionEndpoint code contains an executor for each instance.
Unfortunately nothing shuts down the executor which means that the threads
created by the executor are never destroyed.
I modified the messaging code to include a call
I have sent my suggested fixes to Ron.
I will run more tests later this weekend though as there appears to be another
issue on the server side.
Kev
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4026886#4026886
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index
Thx Kevin.
Yes, we are running 2.2.0.beta1.
BTW I think Ron Sigal may have some fixes for this too - maybe you guys should
liaise?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4026871#4026871
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&o
Hiya Tim.
I have suggested fixes for both of these issues. Initial tests show the client
appearing to remain stable at around 2m-5m.
I'll run more tests later this weekend.
Kev
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4026857#4026857
Reply to the po
The version of remoting appears to be 2.2.0 beta1, is this correct?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4026852#4026852
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4026852
___
Hiya Tim.
Yes, it appears from the profiler that this is a remoting issue. Which version
are you using? Is it 2.0.0GA?
I also agree that it is an anti-pattern and we are working to address this in
the 4.x code. Kurt and I are rewriting this part of the code now.
Kev
View the original post
Thanks Kev - looks like a JBoss Remoting issue.
I will investigate Monday when after I return from California.
BTW - any particular reason ESB is creating so many ephemeral connections?
I would say this is an anti-pattern, although of course this should not be
causing a resource leak.
View the
The following is a copy of the email I sent to our group earlier today.
Kev
-
>From what I can see the issue appears to be related to two things
- The way the current codebase repeatedly creates connections
- The wa
