[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Re: JBoss WSRP consumer and file uploads

2007-05-12 Thread superfilin
Can I ask a stupid question? What is the subversion address for portal project? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4045182#4045182 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4045182

[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Re: JBoss WSRP consumer and file uploads

2007-05-12 Thread superfilin
Nevermind. I figureed it out. http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/portal View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4045184#4045184 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4045184

[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Re: JBoss WSRP consumer and file uploads

2007-05-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Wiki (http://jboss.com/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JBossPortal) is your friend! :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4045190#4045190 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4045190

[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Re: JBoss WSRP consumer and file uploads

2007-05-12 Thread superfilin
Great job, Chris :)! It seems to work now! Although it took me some time to compile the portal out of the source :) Best regards, Andrey View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4045222#4045222 Reply to the post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Re: JBoss WSRP consumer and file uploads

2007-05-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the report and sorry for the trouble! Let us know if you run into any more issues. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4045226#4045226 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4045226

[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Re: JBoss WSRP consumer and file uploads

2007-05-11 Thread superfilin
Hello, Chris! Give me some time. I'll prepare you the requests/responses. Best regards, Andrey View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4044885#4044885 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4044885

[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Re: JBoss WSRP consumer and file uploads

2007-05-11 Thread superfilin
BTW. NetUI tags are tightly integrated with BEA because it was originally their product, but then they opened the source and donated it to Apache. NetUI is always part of BEA Portal installation. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4044886#4044886

[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Re: JBoss WSRP consumer and file uploads

2007-05-11 Thread superfilin
Hello, Chris! I have sent to your e-mail zipped requests/responses as well as view of consumed portlet both on JBoss and BEA consumer. There is a very simple portlet that has one link with one parameter and one form with one field. I performed extacly the same actions on both consumers: 1)

[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Re: JBoss WSRP consumer and file uploads

2007-05-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not sure how current that is but according to this: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEEHIVE-979, it doesn't seem that Portlets are supported with NetUI. I don't know anything about NetUI so I'll try to figure things out but it might just be that there is a problem with using NetUI

[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Re: JBoss WSRP consumer and file uploads

2007-05-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looking at the messages real quick it doesn't seem like it would be a NetUI issue. Going to investigate what's going on... View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4044982#4044982 Reply to the post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Re: JBoss WSRP consumer and file uploads

2007-05-11 Thread superfilin
Yes, I also think that it is not a NetUI problem. And the thing is that exposed portlet is not a JSR 168 portlet. It is a BEA Portal Page Flow Portlet. IMHO, the problem is in the way how JBoss WSRP consumer processes links with parameters. If you look at the WSRP requests/responses between

[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Re: JBoss WSRP consumer and file uploads

2007-05-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I identified a potential issue with our handling of URLs: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPORTAL-1396 I have committed a fix in subversion, please give it a try and let me know if it works for you. View the original post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Re: JBoss WSRP consumer and file uploads

2007-05-10 Thread superfilin
Hello, Chris and Julien! Can you comment on the previous post? Should the link actually work or is it not part of specification (WSRP or JSR168)? We have tried to consume BEA Portlets by BEA WSRP consumer (with all BEA extentions disabled) and links like that work just fine. The same consumed

[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Re: JBoss WSRP consumer and file uploads

2007-05-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How do you create the URLs? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4044712#4044712 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4044712 ___ jboss-user mailing list

[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Re: JBoss WSRP consumer and file uploads

2007-05-10 Thread superfilin
Hello, Chris! Links are created using Apache Beehive NetUI tags on BEA producer part. The forms are created using the same tags. But it is not really important here. When consumer calls WSRP getMarkup method, as far as I understand WSRP, the link is rewritten by BEA WSRP Producer using the URL

[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Re: JBoss WSRP consumer and file uploads

2007-05-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Could you precise how the NetUI tags are integrated with the producer? More precisely, do they use PortletURL to generate the URLs? As far as rewriting goes, there is no token for arbitrary parameters provided in the WSRP specification so I don't see how these parameters end up in the URL.

[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Re: JBoss WSRP consumer and file uploads

2007-05-09 Thread superfilin
JIRA issue created: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPORTAL-1392 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4044172#4044172 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4044172

[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Re: JBoss WSRP consumer and file uploads

2007-05-09 Thread superfilin
Hello, Chris! And what about HTTP GET support? Currently the only way we can submit data from JBoss consumed portlet to a producer is using a from. Correctly encoded links with parameters do not work. What are the plans to support that? Best regards, Andrey View the original post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Re: JBoss WSRP consumer and file uploads

2007-05-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JSR 168 disallow form GET support and currently JBoss Portal could not support it because we encode parameters in the URL. Why do you need that feature ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4044187#4044187 Reply to the post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Re: JBoss WSRP consumer and file uploads

2007-05-09 Thread superfilin
Hello, Julien! anonymous wrote : Why do you need that feature ? The question is not about what method to use to submit the form. It is fine that all forms are using POST method. But sometimes it is needed to create a link to change portlet state instead of a form. I assume when you press the

[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Re: JBoss WSRP consumer and file uploads

2007-05-08 Thread superfilin
Just some details: JBoss Portal: 2.6.0-CR2-bundled View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4043828#4043828 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4043828 ___

[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Re: JBoss WSRP consumer and file uploads

2007-05-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is not yet supported. Please open a JIRA task for it, I'll try to implement it before we go GA with 2.6. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4043961#4043961 Reply to the post :