yes the roles defined are correct.
Actually i have solved one my two issues: the portletB / portletA problem.
It seems that portletB was not really correctly deployed, even if the portlet
was displayed and behaved correctly.
There was a bean naming error in the spring applicationContext.
The str
On top of What Peter said, one thing I just noticed that your portletB setup
has view recursive right for admin role while portletA setup has view recrusive
right for user role. So consider that as well.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4207100#4
Login as admin and go to the Admin portal, the Admin tab.
a) On the Portlet Definitions tab, do both portlets show up?
b) On the Portlet Instances tab, do both portlet instances show up?
c) On the Portal Objects tab, dig down to the portal page and see if both
portal objects show up.
View the or
i have set JBossAS log4j level to debug and there is nothing in the 8MB
server.log about my portlet 1. Not even the name.
Whereas i can see the portlet B deployment logs...
Can this problem be a JBossAS problem and not a portal problem ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?
so my problem also happens with another portlet set.
I have narrowed the problem down to two portlets which seem to mutually
exclusive ...
Actually my portlet A when deployed alone or with other portlets is ok, but
when i also deploy the portlet B, A disapears.
No error in the server logs, is s
I have something like 8 or 10 portlets i think, including the magical one.
Yes i thought it could be some overwriting in the -object.xml but my magical
portlet is configured to be displayed in the default page of the portal.
Each one of the other portlets is configured to be displayed in its own
This would be very difficult to figure out based on your input.. You may want
to post your deployment descriptors. If you are using *-object.xml, may be one
is overwriting the other.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4206761#4206761
Reply to the
