The easiest way to get the Tomahawk (or MyFaces) source, in general is through
SVN, as stated here:
http://myfaces.apache.org/source-repository.html
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4036145#4036145
Reply to the post :
Well,
3 months later, and it looks like we are now going in horribly divergent
directions. Myfaces is initiating the Fusion project which essentially competes
with Seam. I can't help but think if we'd worked together in December this
whole mess could have been avoided. Mario, I commend you for
Seam+Richfaces have a fair amount of overlap. I am using Tomahawk tags in my
app:
1. dataTable
I will be switching these out asap to Richfaces. I currently have no problem
with them, but the Richfaces on looks better. I will see how this process
goes.If I have to makes substantial
So start creating that wiki page. I don't know why everybody in this thread is
waiting for something to happen magically.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4026373#4026373
Reply to the post :
Ok, I think I have to answer tho the entire fusion thing, I think the entire
discussion here and in the other thread is going into an entirely wrong
direction.
First of all I am not the implementor of fusion, I just added a generic jpa
adaptor and I am sort of the first user of it writing an
I added the following page to the wiki
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=SeamJSFComponentCompatibilityList
I encourage all users to list their experiences with, post examples, and
recommendations for use of
andrew.rw.robinson wrote :
| I am using Tomahawk and Seam together for two projects and have not had
many issues (at least that I know of). Instead of saying don't use tomahawk or
don't use seam, why don't we just work through bugs and fix the issues. Both
libraries are very useful for us
imario wrote :
| Maybe we should sign a contract with Jboss about the effort to make our
techniques better compatible.
| Just as everyone do with M$ these days.
|
For sure, this was meant ironic :-)
View the original post :
I mean, you are free to do what you like. Use Tomahawk, please, that's totally
up to you. But if you choose to not take our well-meaning advice, then don't
you think its unreasonable to expect us to support your decision by answering
lots of forum questions?
View the original post :
Whatever.
I try to give people advice that will help them have success on their projects.
It's pretty easy to tell when certain products are unhelpful by simply seeing
the number of, and the nature of, problems that users experience.
I'm not making this judgment in a vacuum. I'm comparing the
anonymous wrote : Even if you had this experience in the past didn't mean that
they are still true.
Fair enough, I'm willing to give you guys a chance.
anonymous wrote : And - what gives you the right to judge in such a drastic way.
What gives me the right is I'm the one people are asking for
If you want to know, you guys will get really far with:
anonymous wrote : yes, we acknowledge that there were some problems in the
past, but we've worked hard to get them fixed and, hey, what we'll do is we'll
go ahead and test our stuff with Seam before the next release, and try to help
out
WE always work hard fixing our bugs if we are aware of them, though, some of us
are idealistic open-source developers, means, they are not hired by a company
which has a separate department just for open-source development.
Some of use (me included) spend many, many hours of our private time to
Tomahawk Seam guys, is there a way we can end the flame wars?
I am using Tomahawk and Seam together for two projects and have not had many
issues (at least that I know of). Instead of saying don't use tomahawk or don't
use seam, why don't we just work through bugs and fix the issues. Both
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : I mean, you are free to do what you like. Use
Tomahawk, please, that's totally up to you. But if you choose to not take our
well-meaning advice, then don't you think its unreasonable to expect us to
support your decision by answering lots of forum questions?
In fact
+1 on working towards better cooperation between Tomahawk and Seam (both the
Products and the Teams ;)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3993990#3993990
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3993990
Bischoje wrote : +1 on working towards better cooperation between Tomahawk
and Seam (both the Products and the Teams ;)
+1 from my side too! :)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3994127#3994127
Reply to the post :
17 matches
Mail list logo
