[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Activation of SFSB and removal of it by Seam question

2007-12-06 Thread asookazian
So the problem was caused by using log4j in the interceptor classes. Should have done a global search I don't know why I thought it was in the 2 SFSB's somehow... However, when I replaced the log4j with Seam log I was getting NullPointerException: @Name("loggerInterceptor") | public class L

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Activation of SFSB and removal of it by Seam question

2007-12-05 Thread asookazian
http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBSEAM-2354 I attached the xhtml, SFSB implementation class and local interface. Only thing is the em.createQuery is based on MS SQL server data. Exception occurs with or w/o the Seam logger and with or w/o injecting the session-scoped SFSB. thx. View the or

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Activation of SFSB and removal of it by Seam question

2007-12-03 Thread asookazian
You stated "Please attach a runnable example with step by step instructions to reproduce so we can take a look." in http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBSEAM-2256 In this case, the use case/app is dependent on data (via JPA entities) in SQL server db as well as using NTLM authentication. That m

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Activation of SFSB and removal of it by Seam question

2007-12-03 Thread asookazian
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : You will get an exception. | | If you can put something simple together that reliably shows this, then create a jira issue and we can take a look. I'm not sure exactly what the root cause is here so I'm not sure I can put together a simple example. I tried to in

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Activation of SFSB and removal of it by Seam question

2007-12-03 Thread asookazian
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : You will get an exception. | | If you can put something simple together that reliably shows this, then create a jira issue and we can take a look. why will I get the exception? And are you talking about the InstantionException specifically? View the original po

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Activation of SFSB and removal of it by Seam question

2007-12-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You will get an exception. If you can put something simple together that reliably shows this, then create a jira issue and we can take a look. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4109636#4109636 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Activation of SFSB and removal of it by Seam question

2007-11-30 Thread asookazian
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : "asookazian" wrote : Is it safe to assume, then, that @In(create=true) will only instantiate a session-scoped SFSB once per session from a conversation-scoped SFSB as long as it is not destroyed somehow or nulled after the first instantiation? | | Yes. | | P

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Activation of SFSB and removal of it by Seam question

2007-11-29 Thread asookazian
more curious behavior today... 09:29:45,317 INFO [LoggerInterceptor] *** Entering method: destroy | 09:29:45,317 INFO [Manager] destroying conversation with garbage lock: 4 | 09:29:45,317 INFO [SecurityAuditAction] in preDestroy | 09:29:45,317 WARN [Component] Exception calling component

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Activation of SFSB and removal of it by Seam question

2007-11-28 Thread asookazian
package com.cox.beans.session; | | import java.util.ArrayList; | import java.util.Calendar; | import java.util.GregorianCalendar; | import java.util.List; | | import javax.annotation.PostConstruct; | import javax.annotation.PreDestroy; | import javax.ejb.PostActivate; | import

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Activation of SFSB and removal of it by Seam question

2007-11-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"asookazian" wrote : Is it safe to assume, then, that @In(create=true) will only instantiate a session-scoped SFSB once per session from a conversation-scoped SFSB as long as it is not destroyed somehow or nulled after the first instantiation? Yes. Post the *whole* source of the SecurityAuditA