[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Inject EL Results

2006-07-21 Thread denis-karpov
anonymous wrote : The backing bean is part of the view No it is not. View connected to the beans by binding expressions. View does not hold references to the beans. In render time, when it is needed to put value in html output it just evaluates binding expression. And then in post time, it

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Inject EL Results

2006-07-21 Thread CptnKirk
While Seam may not have visibility into facelet's internal variable passing mechanism, isn't this information already present in a JSF or Seam context? How are you passing data as a parameter that didn't originate from somewhere Seam does have access? View the original post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Inject EL Results

2006-07-20 Thread MSchmidke
Maybe wrong direction ... but the last idea I had. Mixing business and presentation is bad, agreed. But even in Facelets there should be a possibility to write Java code to compute output text. And in this case, this Java code needs two parameters, no way around. So there's no possibility to

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Inject EL Results

2006-07-20 Thread petemuir
You could preprocess the output [1]. User defined functions (as you mention) are another option. If you have problems with them probably best to post on the facelets user mailing list (they do work as described in the manual). [1] http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopict=86324

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Inject EL Results

2006-07-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
anonymous wrote : So I suppose that there is some kind of local variable storage in Facelets, which is not accessible from Seam. Yes, ofcourse. This is a definite Good Thing. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3959651#3959651 Reply to the post :