[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Is TestNG more convenient then JUnit?

2007-11-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please file a task in jira to write some docs on how to use SeamTest without TestNG (you are always going to have to do some stuff to get it working unlike with TestNG which works ootb, but lets make it possible and documented) View the original post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Is TestNG more convenient then JUnit?

2007-11-08 Thread dmitriy.lapko
Ok, http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBSEAM-2227 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4103027#4103027 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4103027 ___

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Is TestNG more convenient then JUnit?

2007-11-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dmitry - the testng team is very responsive on fixing issues in the testng pluginhave you reported it to them ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4103030#4103030 Reply to the post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Is TestNG more convenient then JUnit?

2007-11-06 Thread damianharvey
Have you tried right-clicking on the Test in Eclipse and going 'Run As - TestNG Test'? Cheers, Damian. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4102195#4102195 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4102195

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Is TestNG more convenient then JUnit?

2007-11-06 Thread dmitriy.lapko
Yes, sure. But after some work it just disappeared. And I cannot say why. But even this menu just generates temp-testng-customsuite.xml instead of running tests without xml. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4102208#4102208 Reply to the post :