[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Mathematical captcha & Email obfuscator

2007-05-02 Thread Homer J.
"petemuir" wrote : ...Post an updated patch and I'll look - this *normally* works with no tricks! Thanks, I posted Patch2.tar.gz. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4042511#4042511 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Mathematical captcha & Email obfuscator

2007-05-02 Thread petemuir
"Homer J." wrote : as parent for s:email I agree with you that it would be conceptually correct / better, but I don't like it because the user would be forced to write more. Further the text (not only the value) get´s obfuscated because, normally, one not only uses a mailto link but also shows

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Mathematical captcha & Email obfuscator

2007-05-02 Thread Homer J.
Thanks for your response! I added attributes & getters / setters to the UI* classes. Regarding h:outputLink as parent for s:email I agree with you that it would be conceptually correct / better, but I don't like it because the user would be forced to write more. Further the text (not only the v

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Mathematical captcha & Email obfuscator

2007-05-02 Thread petemuir
"Homer J." wrote : What do you mean with explicit & implicit attributes? Is it bad that the email tags are derived from the obfuscator tags? The spec suggests anonymous wrote : The render-independent characteristics of a user interface component are represented as JavaBean component properties,

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Mathematical captcha & Email obfuscator

2007-05-01 Thread Homer J.
Thanks for your review once again Peter but - again - there are some parts I don't understand ;) So here it goes, you said: anonymous wrote : JSF components need explicit rather than implicit attributes and to support EL What do you mean with explicit & implicit attributes? Is it bad that the em

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Mathematical captcha & Email obfuscator

2007-04-28 Thread Homer J.
No need to excuse, I don't think that you sounded negative. I just thought this way you have more control over how to integrate it without worries cause it's only a handful of files. Anyway: I converted the whole stuff into 3 patches. It's tested (& working) with todays CVS head and JBoss AS 4.

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Mathematical captcha & Email obfuscator

2007-04-28 Thread petemuir
Sorry, I might have sounded a bit negative on the bug tracker - don't get me wrong - I and everyone else (being presumptuous) is really grateful for your contribution :) "Homer J." wrote : 1. I purposefully didn't use the patch format because I thought it's easier for you to integrate this way

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Mathematical captcha & Email obfuscator

2007-04-27 Thread Homer J.
@Pete Muir: At first let me thank you for your response but some part I don't get so let us fiddle this out ;). You said: anonymous wrote : * the source for your changes need to be submitted in diff format, ideally fairly fine grained (obfuscator seam component, mathematical captcha component,

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Mathematical captcha & Email obfuscator

2007-04-27 Thread Homer J.
JIRA: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1266 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4041553#4041553 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4041553 ___ jbo