You might also take a look at the wiki example, which demonstrates this
extensively. Its dao layer is pojos and the pattern works extremely well.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4045067#4045067
Reply to the post :
Mix them to your hearts content :)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4045065#4045065
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4045065
___
jboss-user mailing list
Thanks Pete,
I did not see any examples of this in the reference apps so I didn't know if
this was frowned upon as a bad architecture or was simply not possible.
So you are saying I can use the TransactionalSeamPhaseListener in an EJB
container? I know the transactions are dealt with a little
Ok, scratch the wiki example I guess, Lol, was typing before I saw Christian's
posts.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4045077#4045077
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4045077
Thanks stu, can you point me to where i can find this example? Is it one of
the example within Seam or somewhere else?
Thanks
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4045075#4045075
Reply to the post :
Yes definitely. The TSPL isn't to do with whether you use POJO/EJB
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4045074#4045074
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4045074
Please don't take the DAOs in the wiki example as a reference :) They have been
done very quick and dirty and will be replaced at some point when I know how
many/which DAO methods I really need.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4045071#4045071
The SeamTransactionalPhaseListener works everywhere, transactional EJB methods
join the transaction.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4045073#4045073
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4045073
