[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: No active transaction?

2007-06-08 Thread toni
What is the best approach then for a task which might last for 1-6 hours, which is the case with mine. I have increased the transaction timeout already to 2h, but yesterday the task stopped after 2h, without raiging any exceptions. I found the following message in the logs: anonymous wrote :

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: No active transaction?

2007-06-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, I'm not sure this discussion really belongs in the Seam forum, but if all the work *really* needs to take place in one transaction, there is usually a programmatic way to set the transaction timeout for the current transaction. For example: UserTransaction.setTransactionTimeout().

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: No active transaction?

2007-06-08 Thread toni
But the outer transaction is always bound to the TransactionTimeout. In essence I'm just looking for a way so that a method is allowed to run as long as it needs to to get the job done. Is it possible in seam to run the whole batch without a transaction? View the original post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: No active transaction?

2007-06-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Most TMs have some kind of transaction timeout if a tx lasts too long. That might be a problem here. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4051968#4051968 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4051968