[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Question about explicit conversation id

2007-06-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not sure. How about submitting a simple, runnable version of your test to JIRA View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4052720#4052720 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4052720 ___

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Question about explicit conversation id

2007-06-08 Thread bsmithjj
nested conversations? no - I wasn't planning on it in this use case. The main thing here is that I was trying to test from SeamTest.FacesRequest that the explicit (custom-generated) conversation id is the conversation id. It looks like the expression for my explicit id is being evaluated the w

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Question about explicit conversation id

2007-06-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are you using nested conversations? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4052709#4052709 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4052709 ___ jboss-user mailing

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Question about explicit conversation id

2007-06-08 Thread bsmithjj
I @In(jected) the conversation component into my bean and then added some code to dump the conversation id in the method invokation. It looks like that's working correctly, it's the SeamTest.FacesRequest that appears to be losing track of the conversation id. New AccessRequestManager2.startReq