[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : Actually Seam 1.1.1 bundles ICEFaces 1.5.2.
|
| But we are really waiting for a bugfix that will be released in ICEFaces
1.5.3. Then things should be working much nicer together.
That's nice. But does it mean what I think it means? I don't have to download
an interesting option would be to define a pdf 'template' file in a page and to
use el expressions to fill in the template. e.g. personalized letters, where
most is defined in the pdf file. Something like working with existing pdf
documents
View the original post :
If I'm not mistaken, you should be able to use facelets templating
(ui:composition/ui:insert/ui:define) with PDF views.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4004603#4004603
Reply to the post :
Those examples make use of PDF forms. I think PDF forms are a high priority.
I was only considering the possibility of posting form data back to the server,
but using it as a template mechanism is very interesting. Designer types would
be able to generate the document using a PDF design
Thank you all for you hard working
I think the security is very important for the Seam and many projects are
waiting for this feature to starting up.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4004704#4004704
Reply to the post :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : anonymous wrote : Is new security ready to use now?
|
| No, that is still scheduled for 1.1.5. Note that the PDF stuff made it in
early 'cos Norman worked hard, but I expect there will also be a few
improvements to that stuff in the next release.
Any estimate when
ICEFaces is compatibile with this release?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4003727#4003727
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4003727
___
jboss-user
ICEFaces 1.5.1 and Seam 1.1.1 are (relatively) the best combination of each so
far. ICEFaces on its own is good, (except the icefaces datepicker which is
unusable), seam is great.
The combination is getting better and better. Now ICEFaces 1.5.2 is out it
should be even better since they made
I also tried the latest ICEFaces and played with the tree component.
Unfortunately it is not really usable, there are rendering issues and the model
binding is unnecessarily complicated by mixing the Swing TreeModel with a
custom IceUserObject extension point. This regularly comes up on the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : Seam 1.1.1 is available for download
|
|
I see new chapter in documentation for 1.1.1 (Chapter 23. Security). Is new
security ready to use now?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4003780#4003780
Reply to the post :
Is there any documentation where to put all the necessary jars in the ear and
which jar is needed since Seam and ICEfaces use similar jars, e. g.
commons-beanutils-1.7.0.jar (Seam) and commons-beanutils.jar (ICEfaces). I
think it's better to use the versioned Seam jars since I can determine the
I just tried out the new itext-functionality. It's great. But there is one
problem. Seam always uses .seam as default extension - generated pdf-url looks
like: http://localhost:8080/seam-doc.seam?docId=3
When manually changing extension as in web.xml defined, pdf will be created
perfectly.
Is
Actually Seam 1.1.1 bundles ICEFaces 1.5.2.
But we are really waiting for a bugfix that will be released in ICEFaces 1.5.3.
Then things should be working much nicer together.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4003964#4003964
Reply to the post :
anonymous wrote : Is new security ready to use now?
No, that is still scheduled for 1.1.5. Note that the PDF stuff made it in early
'cos Norman worked hard, but I expect there will also be a few improvements to
that stuff in the next release.
View the original post :
anonymous wrote : You'll have to ask Norman about that. I agree it would be
much better that way.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4003966#4003966
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4003966
Yes, I'd definitely like to be able to support that as an option. The two
things that complicate the matter are that I don't want to require anyone to
hack web.xml just to use it and I don't want to do anything that would impact
serving static PDFs. I've definitely got that high on my feature
A short tutorial on the pdf stuff:
http://blog.hibernate.org/cgi-bin/blosxom.cgi/2007/01/19#pdf
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4004006#4004006
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4004006
17 matches
Mail list logo
