[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam extended EL + Trinidad

2007-07-18 Thread kingcu
Is this working now with Seam 2.0 B1 and Trinidad 1.0.1/1.2.1? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4065551#4065551 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4065551 ___

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam extended EL + Trinidad

2007-05-08 Thread smithbstl
Ok, thanks for the info Pete! -Brian View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4044039#4044039 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4044039 ___ jboss-user mailin

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam extended EL + Trinidad

2007-05-08 Thread petemuir
The EL extension in Seam 1.2.x is not in 1.3.x. Instead there is jboss-el, which AFAIK supports the same syntax as the el extension, and more. Unfortunately its not currently documented. So, I'm really saying that whether the el extension in 1.2.x works with Trinidad is a moot point. View th

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam extended EL + Trinidad

2007-05-08 Thread smithbstl
Thanks for the reply Pete, So are you saying that the EL extension is no longer included in Seam 1.2.1GA across all of Seam (regardless of Trinidad)? Can you point to me to some more information about the difference between "Seam EL" and "jboss-el"? What does this mean for the seam user? Thank

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam extended EL + Trinidad

2007-05-08 Thread petemuir
The EL extension in Seam 1.2 has been dropped in favour of jboss-el in 1.3 - if this doesn't work with Trinidad, then we shall work on jboss-el or with the Trinidad guys to make it work (I haven't had time to confirm whether it works - easy to try by adding some to the seamdiscs example) View t