[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam suggestion - change Scope and ScopeType annotation

2006-08-29 Thread bsmithjj
anonymous wrote : I think of a context as a closure over a scope. yikes! But that's not what I'm getting at - mainly, it's about simplifying the number of terms used to express the same thing. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3968140#3968140

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam suggestion - change Scope and ScopeType annotation

2006-08-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think I usually use context when I'm thinking of multiple instances of the same scope, and scope when I'm thinking of different scope granularities. But I'm not always very strict about that, and the docs may not always adhere to that. So for example, there is a many-to-one mapping between

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam suggestion - change Scope and ScopeType annotation

2006-08-17 Thread chuckadams
I think of a context as a closure over a scope. Scopes are static constructs in the source, contexts are instances in the runtime. I think context is one of the most overloaded terms in programming, but seam's use is pretty consistent with the way JEE (or at least the servlet spec) uses it.