[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Some doubts about Seam

2007-08-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1. You can implement any architectural pattern you like with Seam, it does not impose an architecture. Of course, some things that were needed in J2EE or in JSF/Spring/Hibernate are simply not necessary in Seam. 2. Check the documentation about Seam-managed transactions. View the original post

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Some doubts about Seam

2007-07-31 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
magoicochea wrote : 1.- How is persistence managed? Does it use EJB 3.0 persistence (I don't know much about EJB) or can I use hibernate? If it uses Hibernate how is it implemented? As usual with Hibernate or does it uses some kind of annotations for it? Seam provides a Seam Managed

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Some doubts about Seam

2007-07-31 Thread SmokingAPipe
To answer your questions: 1. Seam works with either EJB3 or Hibernate. I'm using EJB3 in my projects because EJB3 is a standard. I think that Hibernate itself is a bit more powerful in what it can do. Under the hood, JBoss EJB3 is based on Hibernate I believe. 2. Don't use Tomahawk. I

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Some doubts about Seam

2007-07-31 Thread magoicochea
Thanks for your answers, I have another questions: 1.- When I developed applications with JSF I used a JSF/Spring/Hibernate architecure using Managed Beans/Services/DAOs, the managed beans had the presentation logic, the Services had the business logic and the DAOs had the data access logic,