i have the same problem,do you have mind?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048919#4048919
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048919
___
jboss-user ma
Embedding a s:link for f:param with conversationId does not work.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4048335#4048335
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4048335
___
I checked calendar component, works fine on jboss 4.2, seam 1.2.1 cvs.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4040540#4040540
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4040540
Sorry, exception away.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4040537#4040537
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4040537
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-us
I get a exception, wich lib is not included?
12:55:46,793 ERROR [ExtensionsFilter] Exception wile retrieving addResource
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/myfaces/shared_tomahawk/config/MyfacesConfig
at
org.apache.myfaces.renderkit.html.util.AddResourceFactory.getInstance(AddRes
If they say yes, remember you'll still need a tomahawk.taglib.xml file for
Facelets. You can find one on the Facelets home page.
I'm using MyFaces 1.1.5, Tomahawk 1.1.5 and the Tomahawk treeTable with Seam
1.2.1.GA. This setup works. Please report back if the MyFaces guys say there
are probl
I *think* tomahawk is compatible with JSF 1.2 RI, but I'm not sure. Best ask
at the myfaces project.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4040308#4040308
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4040308
Thanks Gavin.
I've attached a minimal example project to reproduce the problem in JIRA:
http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBSEAM-859
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4017665#4017665
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?modul
This is the first I've heard that *both* don't work. The correct way to handle
these issues is to submit a bug report to JIRA in the "ICE Faces Integration"
category, with sufficient information to allow the problem to be reproduced.
Integration problems are complex and can't be dealt with by ju
Gavin,
I switched from Tomahawk to IceFaces partly based on your recommendation (see
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=95328).
Seam is an awesome product. IceFaces is a good product. Using the products
together I've had to do more trial and error programming than desire
Sorry for my impolite reply. I just get caught by the feature my project
needed. It's the newspaper table component. Absoulutely I love Seam and I'm
trying my best to make surroundings use Seam while many of Chinese use Spring.
I just want the Seam to be perfect to support various feature.
View
Sorry for my late reply. I switched back to the tomahawk upload control. I
tried to use icefaces (I really like it), but I had problems and no time to
solve them.
I will try them out nex time ;-) and switch to ADF/IceFaces.
Anyway, many thanks to everybody, especially to Shane.
ciao Fra
What is "unreasonable" is that Tomahawk uses a servlet filter to accomplish
things that should not require use of such a blunt instrument. There is zero
reason why components like a treeview or a table should require a servlet
filter to operate. Such things are perfectly able to be implemented u
So to use the newspaper table, I have to change the newspaper table tag to seam
to use? It's so unreasonable.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4014793#4014793
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=
The icefaces guys have told me that they will have an open JIRA installation
available sometime next month.
For now, you can report issues in the "ICE Faces Integration" component in the
Seam JIRA (which they are monitoring).
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&o
I'm trouble in it, because of the extended datatable providing the newspaper
table format. Exploring the ADF and ICEFACES, I found no replacement of the
extended datatable.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4014533#4014533
Reply to the post :
ht
Both ADF/Trinidad and ICEFaces provide a tree control, I believe.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4014287#4014287
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4014287
_
Shane,
can you be a bit more precise on the alternatives on using tomahawk? What are
you guys using?
Regards,
Frank
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : And just to follow up, I strongly recommend that
you look for some alternative to using tomahawk. As a general rule,
Seam/tomahawk compatibility is
And just to follow up, I strongly recommend that you look for some alternative
to using tomahawk. As a general rule, Seam/tomahawk compatibility is not a
priority and there may be other issues in the future for which there will be no
easy workaround.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.
So, Shane was being very nice and helpful, as is his nature. Unfortunately my
nature is to be the guy who says "no" to things and pisses everyone off and
I've nixed this change. I won't let the Seam codebase become more complex due
to workarounds for problems with Tomahawk. The trouble with work
I've committed a change to CVS that should work around this issue. It would be
great if you could try it out and let me know if it works or not.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4014055#4014055
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.htm
This is because the tomahawk extensions filter wraps the request with its own
request wrapper if it's a multipart request. I could get the file upload
control to do some reflection gymnastics to unwrap the request if that's the
case... let me see what I can do about it.
View the original post
It was a recommendation due to the fact that many users had had problems with
Tomahawk. Now, the MyFaces team claims they have done work to solve this
problem, and I had meant to remove that line from the docs.
We are working very hard with the icefaces and ajax4jsf teams to iron out
issues enc
Hi Ronald,
Is there an example for using the seam file upload component? The Wiki only
explain how to use tomahawk for uploading files.
Regards
Marco
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4008261#4008261
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/ind
or use the new seam jsf upload component
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4007802#4007802
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4007802
___
jboss-user mai
Hi Yogesh,
I'm not sure if I can really help you, but you can configure the tomahawk File
Upload to store the tempory files on your file system or in your ram.
So could it be that on your remote servers the files are stored in the ram and
therefore the getName() method cannot return the real fi
Is there any information how seam append its conversationId (or whatever) to
the link?
I had a look at the DataScroller and it simply create a HtmlCommandLink
dynamically, so it uses a standard JSF component to render the link.
Don't see what tomahawk does wrong here.
However, I'll point you (t
I am using 1.1 Beta 1 (or my own CVS build when something interesting shows),
JBoss 4.0.5 from Installer Beta3.
And I put org.jboss.seam.ui.facelet.SeamFaceletViewHandler in faces-config.xml
I remove all tomahawk stuff and the some error occurs:
| 18:42:21,152 ERROR [STDERR] 01/11/2006 18:4
So the tomahawk inputFileUpload tag uses commons-fileupload library.
The uploaded file is uploded and stored either in memory or on the disk as a
tmp file.
This is up to the user to write the temporary file into a permanent file.
The FileItem.write(File file) methods will do that but we have to ca
As it's a UICommand component adding
or
should work (but I haven't tried it).
I've used the tomahawk components a bit but they are peculiar in places. I
would suggest trying the ADF (which I think is now called Trinidad) component
set if you are starting from scratch.
View the original pos
So, back to the original topic: Any idea how to get conversations to survive
through Tomahawk components? This is a major block for me right now. I'm very
happy with some of the cool tricks I can do with Tomahawk, but it means that
everything I do has to be Session scope and I can't do any fan
It is from Tomahawk samples.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's what I'm doing now, and it works find - it's just bulky since I'm not
sophisticated enough yet to write custom JSF components.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3968195#3968195
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&
You could turn off the arrow, and then put in two image elements, and have a
rendered="#{..}" attribute on them, which is set by reading values out of the
session bean.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3968193#3968193
Reply to the post :
http:
Yeah, but I want to use it, only substitute an image. I guess it would have to
be a pair of images, up and down.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3968191#3968191
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=repl
Yes, I'm pretty sure you can get rid of it like this:
|
|
|
|
Where it says arrow="true", change that to "false" and I think the arrow will
go away.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3968190#3968190
Reply to the post :
htt
At the risk of turning this into a Tomahawk topic, am I the only one who
detests the little arrow on the Tomahawk table columns for sorting? It appears
to be implemented using a special character rather than an image (which makes
sense), but is there any way to override this with an image? I w
Yes, the sortable Tomahawk table also destroys the conversation. I was
initially having problems with it because I had a conversation-scoped SFSB
holding the table state, and I couldn't figure out why that bean was being
recreated every time I clicked. Well, it's because the conversation scope
Did anyone figure out how to preserve the conversation with the Tomahawk data
scroller? What about the sorting on the Tomahawk table seems like that also
would trash the conversation.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3968138#3968138
Reply to th
And btw, the Seam + Tomahawk demo, which is the "Issue Tracker", is not a very
good demo of using Tomahawk. It only has one file that uses one very small
Tomahawk component. It leaves out the important aspects of Tomahawk, namely,
configuring the ExtensionsFilter properly so that it can embed
Oh I know it looks pretty easy, but I don't want to learn it any more than I
want to learn AWT. I use Swing components so I don't have to build my UI at
the AWT level. Also it seems like you need to be quite good at JS to make
pages that work reliably.
Tomahawk has almost everything I need ri
Hmmm, why wouldn't you want to learn js. I think it is mandatory for a good
webdeveloper that he knows some javascript. I don't think that the several
available java to javascript libraries out there cover every piece
functionality that you probably need.
Javascript is very easy to learn, give
One other thing to say about Tomahawk: I have never written AJAX-type
JavaScript in my life. I am almost completely ignorant of how JavaScript
works. And now I'm using Tomahawk and adding some very cool AJAX-style
features to my pages, like popups, sortable tables, etc, without knowing a
sing
And this is especially frustrating because conversations are the "natural"
scope of things in Seam. And they are a great idea. One of the major ideas of
Seam was that the Session scope does not make sense for the way people want to
use a web application. Tomahawk gives us all these great comp
I'm having the exact same problem. Does anyone have a solution? Obviously
what needs to happen is the conversationId needs to be passed along. I guess
Tomahawk isn't aware of conversations (which are a seam thing).
I made my SFSB SESSION scope and then my sortable DataTable works fine. But
45 matches
Mail list logo
