Hi,
As of last week Seam 2.0 has become productive. Has the situation changed in
any way?
What I noticed is that the original way of propagation of this hack is not
possible anymore with Seam 2.0 because the line
No. I've scheduled the issue however.
Try replacing the line with
ConversationPropagation.instance().setConversatonId(convId);
| Manager.instance().restoreConversation();
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4104040#4104040
Reply to the post :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
| No. I've scheduled the issue however.
|
Pete,
As you guys talk about this here are some things I have noticed that need to be
looked at for closer Seam/Trinidad integration.
- dialogs
- which is how this thread original was started and the hack provided
Please create a JIRA issue for each area of integration needed (e.g. one for
tables, one for skinning). Put them in the JSF category for now.
N.b. this isn't high up the dev teams priority list - for obvious reasons we
need to deal with RichFaces integration first. *But* if people can create
smithbstl wrote :
| I still can't find a way to propagate the conversation to the dialog
window. I have tried the above mentioned Phase Listener and also the
s:conversationPropagation tag in Seam's Library. Neither seem to work.
|
The test app I put together does propagate the
Please check in my provided listeners, if you are using conversationId
paramter name od cid parameter name...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4042826#4042826
Reply to the post :
which is correct? coversationId or cid?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4042834#4042834
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4042834
___
jboss-user mailing
The one that is configured in your components.xml.
In your case probably cid ?!
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4042836#4042836
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4042836
Ok thanks. It was consistent between components.xml and the phase listener.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4042837#4042837
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4042837
Can one of you create a JIRA issue for me? I need to know what the exact
problem you are encountering is (and how I can replicate), and what you are
doing to solve it and the relevant classes. Then I can roll it into the
jboss-seam-trinidad.jar and seamdiscs example. Thanks!
View the original
I have created the jira, Chris or dajevtic, feel free to add anything I may
have left out.
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1289
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4042843#4042843
Reply to the post :
smithbstl wrote : Chris, I have followed your instructions and am not seeing
the conversation propagated.
|
| 1st page has a conversation id (cid) of 1
| 2nd page (long running conversation) cid=2
| 3rd page(page with dialog link) cid=2
| dialog page cid=4
hmmm... note sure what to
I have modified the JIRA. I can try to answer questions
Chris
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4042854#4042854
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4042854
Thanks Chris, I am going through your example now. Just one thing, you have a
MySQL datasource defined in persistence.xml You should change this to
Hypersonic for the example so it will run out of the box. Just requires a
change to DefaultDS as the JNDI name of the datasource in
Ok I finally have this working. I think it had to do with not having my tags
enclosed in a trh:body element which is required to get PPR working. I thought
a tr:document would suffice but I guess not?
Also I have done some limited testing with the Phase Listener/Action Listener
provided by
Thanks Chris, I have it most of the way working except for a couple of issues.
1. When i use a commandLink to open the dialog, I can't get PPR to refresh the
inputText on the orginal page. I keep getting this message
ERROR [STDERR] May 1, 2007 9:11:57 AM
Thanks Chris, I have a return listener already which is functioning correctly,
just not the PPR to refresh the page
public void processReturn(ReturnEvent event) {
| if (event.getReturnValue() != null) {
| //setUserName(((User)(event.getReturnValue())).getUserName());
Hi. Have you ever tried placing your to-be-updated tags into a panelGroupLayout
or panelLabelAndMessage?
I use inputListOfValues for either inputting or selecting a postal code from a
list of values and upon selection i update the calling page's fields with city
and country info. It all works
I will try your suggestion dajevtic, thanks
A couple of questions,
1. Are you still using the code you provided earlier in the thread (Phase
Listener and Action Listener)? I know those comments are a number of months
old and didn't if anything on either Seam or Trinidad was fixed to make
Hi, yes I still use the phase- and action listeners, but to be honest, I
haven't tested in months, whether it works without them.
I've beem using the SeamFaceletViewHandler since I switched to Facelets some
weeks ago.
If my solution doesn't work, then let me know. I'll provide more info.
View
ok - I created a quick test application to demonstrate the Trinidad Dialog /
Seam integration. It can be found at:
https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=189858
To use it:
This is a simple test app showing Trinidad Dialogs working with the Seam
framework. To use, deploy the
I don't have a sample I can post. But I'll help you through it if I can.
There might even be a better way. Here's what I did/know:
1) I used the classes dajevtic posted at the start of this thread.
- The ActionListener needs to be a subclass of the one provided by MyFaces or
the Sun RI.
Chris, I am also having problems getting dialogs to work with Seam, could you
post a working example since you seem to have gotten it working? It would
really help to see all the pieces together in one place.
Thanks
View the original post :
chane,
I'm glad you got it sorted out.
However, you might want to consider not using bindings at all. To me they are
actually the most useless feature of JSF...
I actually didn't quite figure out why you are using the bindings at all?!
View the original post :
I was using the bindings more because that was the example of how to use the
dialogs with the Trinidad documentation.
If I didn't want to use bindings (which I don't really have a preference), how
can I update the field on the calling page from the dialog selection. How do
you use dialogs?
Mainly I use the following class for consistent dialog handling for trinidad:
package de.livemediagroup.dialog;
|
| import java.util.Hashtable;
| import java.util.Map;
|
| import org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.context.RequestContext;
| import
dj - thanks for your help and writing the code you posted very early in this
discussion. I finally got it to work.
The trick is that the component that is the target for the binding element on
the tr:inputText binding=#{dialogManager.input}.../ can not be a
Conversation Scoped Component. Once
I'm pretty sure the Conversation scope is added to Stateful components
automatically. Anyway, I added it explicitly to see if that had any affect and
I still get the same error.
Maybe I should back up a step and prepare a simple application that I could
upload so that people could take a
Hi Chane.
Try adding @Scope(ScopeType.CONVERSATION) to the class.
That should do the trick.
If not let me know and I'll try your code myself.
Regards,
dj
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4036619#4036619
Reply to the post :
dj-
When you created the bean that manages the dialog, did you use a Seam managed
bean or did you create a backing bean entry in faces-config.xml?
I'm using the Seam @Name and getting a wicked error when I click on the button
to initiate the dialog.
Thanks for any insight.
Chris
The
Trinidad provides sorting and paging on it's enhanced DataModel
(CollectionModel) - I'm working on backing this with EntityQuery (and hence the
database) rather than doing the paging and sorting in java - I haven't finished
this yet so there is some weird behaviour...
View the original post :
Hi Chane. Let's see:
chane wrote :
| 1) Did you extend/override the Seam PhaseListener or did you incorporate
another one into the stack?
|
Created my own phase listener and added it in faces-config like this:
| lifecycle
| phase-listener
|
By the way. Please remember that the Listener only checks if the action source
is of type CoreCommandLink!
If you also use a CoreCommandButton or a somewhere then you must add the
check for this instance as well, or just use the super class UIXCommand.
I'm not 100% sure, but if you want to make
petemuir wrote : Trinidad provides sorting and paging on it's enhanced
DataModel (CollectionModel) - I'm working on backing this with EntityQuery (and
hence the database) rather than doing the paging and sorting in java - I
haven't finished this yet so there is some weird behaviour...
ah...
dajevtic wrote : By the way. Please remember that the Listener only checks if
the action source is of type CoreCommandLink!
| If you also use a CoreCommandButton or a somewhere then you must add the
check for this instance as well, or just use the super class UIXCommand.
| I'm not 100% sure,
dj - thanks for the info on dialogs. I am just starting to incorporate the
trinidad dialog functionality into my app. Couple of questions if you have the
time:
1) Did you extend/override the Seam PhaseListener or did you incorporate
another one into the stack?
2) Same question for the
Chris, take a look at the seamdiscs example in Seam CVS, it shows Seam,
Trinidad, RichFaces and Ajax4jsf working together - note that it is work in
progess (especially regarding the tables).
I've yet to use Trinidad dialogs - I'll see if I can incorporate them into the
example somewhere.
View
petemuir,
Thanks for the info. I'll check out the seamdiscs example. If you get
something working with dialogs can you post here so I am sure to check. I'll
be checking out the Seam head tomorrow and will keep checking.
Also, are you having issues with the Trinidad tables or just trying to
My appologies for not answering earliert. I didn't sign up for notification of
new posts. If anyone still needs help regarding this matter, I'll be glad to
help.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4029071#4029071
Reply to the post :
Is this only necessary when using the PPR of Trinidad and if using ajax4jsf
there is no need or is this a general must-do if using trinidad together with
seam correctly.
Could you give some more detail on the PhaseListener. Is it necessary to write
an own PhaseListener that overrides the
AFAIK there has been no work on the Seam codebase to improve trinidad
integration (waiting on a release from Trinidad)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4009289#4009289
Reply to the post :
Does anybody know if this is still necessary with 1.1.5 GA of Seam?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4009207#4009207
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4009207
Hi Chane,
we used Seam and Trinidad in several of our POCs. No production applications
yet, though.
I remember that we had to incorporate an additional phase listener along with
an action listener configured in faces-config when using the dialog framework
of Trinidad / ADF, because the
43 matches
Mail list logo
