Not trying to criticize the good work that is being done with Seam, but just
curious as ever: can anyone comment on the choice to add a conversationId
element in the Soap header? This is documented as:
anonymous wrote : So how are conversations propagated between web service
requests? Seam
What we really wanted to use for this stuff was WS-Contexts, but JBossWS does
not implement it yet. Shane tried to use WS-Addressing but it didn't work out
(not sure of the details) and eventually he decided to do it this way after
talking to the JBossWS folks.
View the original post :
Conversation management and JBPM integration is still being worked on, however
web services that don't use this particular feature should be fine to use.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4054156#4054156
Reply to the post :
Yeah, we unfortunately had to slip the conversation management stuff to the
next release, but it is now possible to implement a WebService in Seam
(finally).
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4054188#4054188
Reply to the post :
