[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Web service interface stable in 1.3.0 ALPHA?

2007-06-27 Thread avbentem
Not trying to criticize the good work that is being done with Seam, but just curious as ever: can anyone comment on the choice to add a conversationId element in the Soap header? This is documented as: anonymous wrote : So how are conversations propagated between web service requests? Seam

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Web service interface stable in 1.3.0 ALPHA?

2007-06-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What we really wanted to use for this stuff was WS-Contexts, but JBossWS does not implement it yet. Shane tried to use WS-Addressing but it didn't work out (not sure of the details) and eventually he decided to do it this way after talking to the JBossWS folks. View the original post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Web service interface stable in 1.3.0 ALPHA?

2007-06-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Conversation management and JBPM integration is still being worked on, however web services that don't use this particular feature should be fine to use. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4054156#4054156 Reply to the post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Web service interface stable in 1.3.0 ALPHA?

2007-06-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yeah, we unfortunately had to slip the conversation management stuff to the next release, but it is now possible to implement a WebService in Seam (finally). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4054188#4054188 Reply to the post :