Nope, this is expected. Declare the parameters as page parameters and they will
be preserved.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4021431#4021431
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4021431
I *think* this has been fixed in CVS. Could you try it with 1.1.7RC1?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4021426#4021426
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4021426
ooops!
Sorry, after another try it worked!
I messed up with the pages.xml files of versions 1.1.6.GA and CVS of 02-18-2007.
As soon as the request parameters are defined in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it works fine.
Hi,
I have following problem: if an inital GET request with parameters is sent to a
restricted view,
the redirect to the login page works fine,
after successful authentication a redirect happens to the captured view,
but the request parameters are NOT restored.
This can be reproduced with the
Indeed, I had a tag.
Thank you very much.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4016113#4016113
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4016113
___
jboss-user m
captureCurrentView() begins a conversation, and returnToCapturedView() ends it,
only if there is no long-running conversation already active. So you are
definitely doing something wrong.
Make sure that you have no tag in the exception handler, or
@End annotation anywhere.
View the original po
I couln't make these feature work until I change its scope from
ScopeType.CONVERSATION to ScopeType.SESSION
I noticed that it wasn't the same instance of Redirect component which has been
called in captureCurrentView and returnToCapturedView, so I realized it was
because of the scope.
I just
Thanks a lot for your reference. It's quite impressive the evolution speed of
the framework.
By the way, the manual of 1.1.6GA doesn't contain such section (12.2.6) neither
the seamspace example includes those nice tags.
Regards,
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?modul
Yeah, thats wrong. Now fixed in CVS.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4015644#4015644
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4015644
___
jboss-user mailing
Bingo. Thanks, Gavin. pages.xml in seamspace (CVS) uses the
tag in the handlers. Should those be taken out?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4015638#4015638
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&
anonymous wrote : I'm obviously missing something in my configuration because
it's not working.
Actually you have something extra. Get rid of in the
handler.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4015637#4015637
Reply to the post :
http://www.j
anonymous wrote : What I'm really missing is the possiblity to start a new
pageflow within an existing one and to return upon the end of the inner one to
the page where one has left the outer / started the inner pageflow.
If I'm understanding you correctly, you are asking for a nested pageflow t
Gavin, thanks for pointing that out. I'm obviously missing something in my
configuration because it's not working. I have the following (deployed to
4.0.5.GA)
components.xml
|
|
|
| /META-INF/security-rules.drl
|
^ Reading the above again I wrote I down wrong: actually I consider a pageflow
a transaction (with a manual flush mode so stuff is saved at the end of the
pageflow / transaction).
What I mean is that I would expect to get the transaction from the inner
pageflow "merged" into the transaction of
I'm not sure if I understood you right (may be my english ;)).
I don't consider a pageflow a transaction but more something like a workflow /
unit of work - therefore stuff is probably only saved at the end of the
pageflow when all necessary input is entered (at least this is how I used it
most
spambob: did you try the to see if it actually does what you want ?
redirection to the middle of a transaction?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4015609#4015609
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=rep
Sorry to hijack this because my problem isn't related to the security stuff but
more to redirect.captureCurrentView & redirect.returnToCapturedView.
What I'm really missing is the possiblity to start a new pageflow within an
existing one and to return upon the end of the inner one to the page wh
Good Job @Jboss Team! . Keep up the good work, keep the good stuff coming and
let us test it for you :)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4015600#4015600
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=401560
Look at components.xml in the seamspace example. Here's the relevant bits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This feature is also covered in the Seam documentation, in section 12.2.6 (the
security chapter).
View the original post :
http://www.jboss
Guys, its right there in the 1.1.6 release announcement!
http://blog.hibernate.org/cgi-bin/blosxom.cgi/2007/02/08#seam-116
If you generate an application using seam-gen, this feature is built-in.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4015571#4015571
This would be extremely useful to us as well. Right now I am embedding our
logon form in our main template and display it (and the page content)
conditionally. The net result is that the user gets the requested page upon
successful login, but can't reload the page without getting "Are you sur
acegi supports this feature, and I found it to be very useful. Would also like
to see it as part of Seam security
+1
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4015508#4015508
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode
I believe this is not currently available
+1 :)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4015499#4015499
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4015499
___
jboss-
23 matches
Mail list logo
