[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam 2.0 / Tomahawk 1.1.6

2007-10-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We (Seam dev team) don't spend any time trying to get Tomahawk working with Seam. We do have demos for RichFaces, Trinidad and Icefaces though. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4095542#4095542 Reply to the post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam 2.0 / Tomahawk 1.1.6

2007-10-16 Thread yilmaz_
tomahawk 114 has same problem. you can put manually that hidden field in your source View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4095622#4095622 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4095622

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam 2.0 / Tomahawk 1.1.6

2007-10-15 Thread javasmith
Upgrade to the latest snapshot version of Tomahawk from SVN. This problem is fixed there. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4095423#4095423 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4095423

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: seam 2.0 Tomahawk

2007-08-17 Thread dreuzel
thanks i'll keep your advice in mind I was looking for en edit tag, does not seem to be in richfaces View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4075153#4075153 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4075153

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: seam 2.0 Tomahawk

2007-08-14 Thread ASavitsky
I successfully used both 1.1.5 and 1.1.6 Tomahawk versions (mostly dataTable and dataScroller components), though later switched to RichFaces anyway - it delivers more functionality and less bugs in a smaller footprint. Mind you, some Tomahawk components (such as saveState) shouldn't even be