Ok, thanks. I will give it a try and hope, that it works :)
Greetings
Mike
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4024572#4024572
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4024572
__
Rights, I was already using ajax4jsf though. But just from my experience when I
upgraded my webapp from JSF to Seam that runs on Resin on remote hosting I
actually gained a lot of performance due to introduction of conversation (had
to use request before) that allowed to use some sort of caching
Hi svadu,
thanks. Good to know, that JBoss works on it. Tomcat should be enough for my
app. But you have only been working with JSF, not the full JBoss Seam
framework, right?
Greetings
Mike
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4024250#4024250
Rep
May be this wil help... I used to run a small JSF application JBoss 4.0.3 on
PIII,500MHz,256MB RAM. The deployment was pretty slow (so I dont recommend it
for development) but once deployed it did the job (I also didn't have high load
btw).
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.h
Hi,
thanks for your answers. Well sorry. I meant, I wanna run the applications on
this machine. The development will happen on another one. So I don't need
eclipse or anything else but JBoss Seam with a database behind working on it.
More memory or cpu power is not possible at the moment and I
I used to work in a Win XP 512Mb RAM with JBOSS 4 + JBoss Eclipse. It was on
the edge. With 1Gb of RAM it's perfect... but also consider a better processor.
In my old AMD XP 2000/512M RAM -> 1min 30sec to start JBOSS from Eclipse
In my new AMD Athlon 3800/1Gb RAM -> 25 sec
Regards,
Ricardo
Vie
anonymous wrote : I have an old machine and wanna use it for developing with
jboss seam.
Well, you can try, but I think its going to be very painful. I strongly
recommend more memory than that.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4024027#4024027
R
Why not just try it and see? And yes, I would recommend using Tomcat. It's
possible to slim down JBoss quite a bit, but it does have a good size out of
the box footprint in the profile that's required for Seam.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=
