Fantastic! Many thanks!! This clears up my mystery and my erroneous
functional expectation.
Happy new year
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3997839#3997839
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=
At ease... indeed ;-) Fundamental bugs can slip by testing, fundamental
functionality naa :-)
OK, so instead of you looking at the api, I did it (once, since it is a happy
new year!!)
The api docs say this:
| /**
|* returns all the taskInstances for the this process ins
Easy, friend. :-) I didn't say this is necessarily a bug, although it could
be. Fundamental bugs certainly can slip by testing of any software on occasion.
I got these API calls from one of the tutorials. I'll go back and look for the
others you mention, but that doesn't change my experience
hmmm... do you realy think such a simple fundamental 'issue' would not have
been caught in the tests? Look at the api, you' ll see there are other methods
to retrieve (unfinished) tasks and/or methods to check whether a task is
finished or not.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/i
