Then build a full custom node which does not need a transition.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4134535#4134535
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4134535
Hi bungrudi ,
I was trying to do something similar to what you are talking about. My idea is
to have a node using which I should be able to define the transitions at
runtime.
Have a look at the sample process definition below, if you observe state 3 does
not have any transition.
?xml
It IS possible to simply move token into arbitrary nodes (of course these would
HAVE to be nodes with wait-states...) but that seems an awfully ham-fisted way
of using jBPM!
And how transitions can 'lessen the expressiveness' of a graph execution
environment is beyond my comprehension. It also
pojomonkey wrote : It also suggests that perhaps you're not fully grasping
what jBPM is about.
quite possibly.
maybe I'm not looking the problem from the jBPM perspective.
what i meant by not needing any Transition is that we can officially move
token into arbitrary nodes, without regarded
think the other way around. do not move the node, move the tokens. Give
each a none meaningful transition (or even use a decsionnode, even better)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4134272#4134272
Reply to the post :
kukeltje wrote : think the other way around. do not move the node, move
the tokens. Give each a none meaningful transition (or even use a decsionnode,
even better)
yes, i used decision node and transitions, and moved the tokens instead of the
node. but then my xml is full of
