Ok. i do not put a controller class because i use WfEngine for that. Here is
some wfengine works:
|
| final String taskInstanceId = BPMEngineRegistry.getLocalId(wfTask.id);
|
|
|
| wfEngine.signal(wfTask.path.id, null);
| wfEngine.endTask(taskInstanceId, null);
|
in your processdefinition xml "controller class attribute is blank" how come
you were able to complete the two parallel task? after removing controoler
class tag from xml the process instance ended sucussfully.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=
Hi,
I have same problem. here is my process definition:
|
|
|
| a test for fork/join workflow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
you are right about the signal method. I tried another small process with
action handlers.In action hanlder classes i used once leaveNode method it
worked perfectly. But when I changes leaveNode method to signal method got the
same problem. thanks .. able to fix this one...
View the original p
ok i iwll try to use executionContext.leaveNode() instead of signal method...
will update u in few mins...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4230292#4230292
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=423
Are you sure the actions are completely finished. Check your database to see in
which node your token is.
Also, executionContext.getProcessInstance().signal(); is going to give you
strange behaviour since now you are signalling the root token. Try to use
executionContext.leaveNode().
View th
you are right its not complete code... i just put only part of code... in
actionhandler i used executionContext.getProcessInstance().signal(); statement
at the end. My question is if these two parallel activities gets completed why
join node is still waiting to send signal to the next activity
Is this the complete process def?
There is no node called 'RealEstateProcInvoke', which is one of the parallel
activities.
Nonetheless, my guess is that you probably forgot to add execution.leaveNode()
at the end of your custom actionHandler.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index
|
|
|
|
|
| getScore
|
http://localhost:9090/CalculatorApp/CalculatorWebServiceService?wsdl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
show your processdefinition and even better, a full unittest with embedded
processdefinition (as a string), actionhandlers as inner classes etc
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4230114#4230114
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.
yes and I think you can see that yourself as well.. it's very, very easy...
remove the right join (why is that there anyway) of the two that are on the
same line and put an additional fork after the first one, but before the
uploadmediafile and uploadmetadata
View the original post :
http
This is my process graph. Based on what you kindly explained I guess it is not
fully nested. Is there a workaround to make it nested?
http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/Mz7FzmzWwgYywwhI1b-cnQ?authkey=Gv1sRgCKmBjfD-hr6rhgE&feat=directlink
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html
even
fork 1
fork 2
join 2
join 1
is ok
(fork/join 2 is fully inside fork1/join1
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4219321#4219321
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4219321
_
All transitions from a fork have to end in the same join. If there is no
additional fork in between it has to be the join they encounter.
Fork 1
Join 1
Fork 2
Join 2
is ok
Fork 1
Join 2
Fork 3
Join 1
is not
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewto
"kukeltje" wrote : forks/joins have to be fully nested, from what I quickly
scanned they are not in your case
What does that mean to be fully nested
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4219313#4219313
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.
forks/joins have to be fully nested, from what I quickly scanned they are not
in your case
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4219307#4219307
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4219307
___
16 matches
Mail list logo
