As I am new to jBPM I was wondering from my workflow if there was anything you
could suggest that would improve it?
I have no wait states and thus all the java nodes will probably end up being
custom nodes passing an object from one to the other till the end. Is this ok?
View the original
If it does the job, scales well, I would change nothing
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4250371#4250371
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4250371
___
or is it 'I wouldn't change anything'?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4250372#4250372
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4250372
___
jboss-user mailing
Thanks Ronald.
I'll look in to this and I will give that a try.
M
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4250072#4250072
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4250072
I am creating a variable and starting the process by providing these variables
on startup.
| MyObject myObject = new MyObject();
| myObject.setName(a name to set);
|
| variables.put(myObj, myObject);
|
| ProcessInstance processInstance =
show your process
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4250142#4250142
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4250142
___
jboss-user mailing list
better, show the whole unit test.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4250144#4250144
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4250144
___
jboss-user mailing list
Okay so here's my workflow
| ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
|
| process name=process xmlns=http://jbpm.org/4.0/jpdl;
|start g=0,0,80,40
| transition to=parse request/
|/start
|
|java class=org.tlg.workflow.ParseRequest g=90,4,80,40
method=execute
Yep, was afraid of this.
You odo not have any states in your definition, once it passes through all
nodes, it is ended and removed from the active database to the history
database. Good in one way, troublesome in this case.
Just add a task before the end nodes and you can see the variables
Hi Roland
Thank you very much. It works like a charm now.
Be sure I will be back with some more newbie questions but just wanted to say
thank you very much for your time and explanation on why it doesn't work.
Regards
M
View the original post :
Don't know why I'm calling you Roland :) Sorry, I meant Ronald!
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4250228#4250228
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4250228
no problem
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4250259#4250259
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4250259
___
jboss-user mailing list
Process variables should exactly behave like this. So please give that a try or
make a unit test that demonstrates what you want to do.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4250001#4250001
Reply to the post :
13 matches
Mail list logo
