[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: Strange behaviour when using fork

2008-03-05 Thread bungrudi
to jbpm developers, it would save me a whole day if you just throw an exception for all unsupported actions, such as calling node.leave() or token.signal() from inside action handler. regards, Rudi View the original post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: Strange behaviour when using fork

2008-03-05 Thread bungrudi
bungrudi wrote : to jbpm developers, | | it would save me a whole day if you just throw an exception for all unsupported actions, | | thats a rather self important comment from someone who have just spent his whole day debugging jbpm. :) sorry for that. View the original post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: Strange behaviour when using fork

2008-03-05 Thread pojomonkey
bungrudi wrote : | thats a rather self important comment from someone who have just spent his whole day debugging jbpm. But you weren't 'debugging' jBPM, but your own incorrect usage! bungrudi wrote : :) sorry for that. And so you should be! View the original post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: Strange behaviour when using fork

2008-03-05 Thread bungrudi
pojomonkey wrote : | But you weren't 'debugging' jBPM, but your own incorrect usage! | debugging my own app then. pojomonkey wrote : And so you should be! i am. but i still think that throwing exception on incorrect usages (like my case) is a good idea. View the original post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: Strange behaviour when using fork

2008-03-05 Thread kukeltje
it's rather not really easy in the current implementation of the core since it is dependent on the node. The generic actionhandler base then has to have knowledge about which nodes. In the pvm (basis of 4.0) things will change View the original post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: Strange behaviour when using fork

2008-03-04 Thread bungrudi
bungrudi wrote : | | I have a flow that basically does the following: | AO - RO#1 - ... - HBS - REV_ADM - REV#1 - ... - REV#3 - |- COM_ADM - COM#1 - ... -COM#3 - | | (continued) | join1 - dropped | | to be clearer: | AO - RO#1 -

[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: Strange behaviour when using fork

2008-03-04 Thread bungrudi
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopict=129225 looks like a clue to me :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4134124#4134124 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4134124

[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: Strange behaviour when using fork

2008-03-04 Thread bungrudi
ok here is an important point for you who happen to stumble into this thread.. Action handlers _MAY NOT_ continue graph of execution. it means that you cannot do node.leave(), executionContext.leave(), or token.signal() from inside an action handlers. There is one case where you are allowed to