kukeltje wrote : Glad to hear I'm an 'inspirator'
You should start a sect, maybe they'll call you an 'instigator' than later :-P
Cheers,
Koen
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4135218#4135218
Reply to the post :
The join in the websale example implies that the process cannot continue until
*both* are finished. It might not be real-world compliant, but that's just how
it was designed.
Your finish-to-finish (one cannot finish before the other) requirement imo
creates a dead-lock. They both have to
I tried putting a condition on a leaving transition - but that just complicates
matters.
kukeltje wrote : Why not simply introduce things like 'prepare shipment' that
is where the ship item is now and move the ship item below the join
Interesting thought - I could have a 'start' even before
business process automation and the process design that is part of it is about
thinking out of the box, the box in this case being the processes as people
*perceive* them. Most of the time you cannot do this without business process
redesign.
Glad to hear I'm an 'inspirator' :-)
View the
Despite now having got various scenarios working with forks, joins and
sub-processes, I'm still not clear on how I can achieve finish-to-finish
synchronisation except by some logic external to jBPM.
I would welcome any thoughts on this.
View the original post :
First of all, there are different tasks to be performed by different actors and
furthermore, the tasks are starting at different times.
So they are not 'sequential' as such - there is simply a constraint on them
finishing in a particular order.
If I stick them all on a single task node, or put
Just to clarify - rather than necessarily finish in a specific order, the tasks
must not finish before one (or, in the general case, one or more) other task is
finished.
You have queried my use of fork, but are you really saying that fork is only
appropriate where the tasks are entirely
uhhmmm... why did you put them in forks if you want them in sequence (at least
that is what you describe)?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4129853#4129853
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4129853
