Do you think there should be a fix for this issue ? Should I file a Jira ?
I personnaly think this will be an issue for all people that use jBPM for
orchestrating remote services that take a long time to execute.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=
Jeff, if I understand correctly the difference between my installation and
yours is that I use the JMS system for async execution while you use the
built-in database-based messaging system.
For what it's worth, in my case I don't feel the need to use asynchronous
continuations because of parall
anonymous wrote : if possible complete ready process instance 1 jobs before
working on process instance 2 jobs.
|
sounds like serial processing. Then why not delay the start of the processes?
Start process 2 once process 1 is finished? I know, does not sound realistic,
but how should a 'sch
Hi,
I'm facing a similar issue. We need to process 100's of groups of files. Each
file group results in the creation of a process instance. Each process has a
number of steps. Some of these steps take 10's of minutes or hours to process.
Therefore we are using the embedded async continuation m
