Hi,
we are also having the serialization problem and unfortunately there is no rc
for 1.4.1 by now. Is there a chance to get the fixed version soon ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3994773#3994773
Reply to the post :
The fix is in 1.4.1CR1. Will come out soon.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3986509#3986509
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3986509
___
jboss-user
Sorry, I didn't see your post untill now. Yes, I have tried to reproduce your
step. Obviously it is a bug in 1.4 release.
Here is the Jira:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-847
Current, 1.4.1 is in beta mode, so GA should come out in about 2 weeks
timeframe. If you are in a hurry, you
I would suggest that if you could add a method that will allow me to get back
the original pojo (copy of) without removing the POJO from the cache, it would
be create!
Is this a possible ???
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3986107#3986107
Do you want PojoCache to introduce the Cloneable interface such that you can
clone the POJO?
But if removeObject can do the job, is there still a need to so?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3986134#3986134
Reply to the post :
The ability to clone the POJO and get the not aspectized copy of it would be
ideal. In fact, when I want a copy, I don't necessarily want to remove it from
the cache and I definitely don't want the aspectized version of it (since I
should not be concerned about aspectization).
PS: Event though
Well, actually, if you want to get aound it, you can implement Cloneable in
your POJO and clone it yourself.
PS: yes, it is a bug that I will fix soon.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3986375#3986375
Reply to the post :
Hi guys,
I think my observation (XML representation of the POJO) might be too
complicated. I just wanted to express the fact that removing the object from
the cache does not give me back the original POJO like expected according to
Ben.
Is someone has some ideas???
I am a bit surprise that
If you do removeObject, it should give you back the original POJO. Later on,
you can do another putObject again (as a merge, so to speak).
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3984821#3984821
Reply to the post :
