Can someone please confirm:
Would this then the correct usage of BatchModeTransactionManager in the context
I mentioned?
| BatchModeTransactionManager txMgr =
BatchModeTransactionManager.getInstance();
| txMgr.begin();
| child.clearData();
| child.putAll(recordVals.getValues());
| tx
Probably no good reason; i.e. BatchModeTransactionManager is relatively newer
so the habit was to use Dummy.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4040307#4040307
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4
I forgot about that JNDI bind part. Any reason why unit tests don't use
BatchModeTransactionManager instead?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4040290#4040290
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4
The differently named version already exists -- see
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=BatchModeTransactionManager.
DummyTransactionManager is a unit testing tool, and one of the things it does
is when you retrieve the singleton instance, it registers itself in JNDI as
java:/TransactionMa
"genman" wrote :
| Although there could easily be an API for handling atomic data clear/put,
there is none and will be none for many other similar situations, such as bulk
put or bulk remove. So, your best bet is to learn to like transactions.
"genman" wrote : I would say the DummyTransactio
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-1033
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4040046#4040046
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4040046
___
jboss-u
Although there could easily be an API for handling atomic data clear/put, there
is none and will be none for many other similar situations, such as bulk put or
bulk remove. So, your best bet is to learn to like transactions.
Manik s. (who often haunts these forums) came up with the documentatio
What about in 2.0 beta? I didn't seem that say passage in the 2.0 documents.
Plus, the doc is a bit vague. Seems like I'm supposed to use one if I'm using
the JBoss app server (which I'm not), and use the dummy one if I'm using JBoss
cache standalone (which I am) - except that the dummy one is
Look at this example:
http://labs.jboss.com/file-access/default/members/jbosscache/freezone/docs/1.4.0/TreeCache/en/html/transactions.html
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4039457#4039457
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?mod
"genman" wrote : There used to be a Node.putAll(Map map, boolean erase) method.
|
| The thread safe way (at the moment) is to use a transaction.
But ... I thought that transactioning was automatic and completely hidden away
from the user. Is that incorrect? If so, how would I go about wrap
There used to be a Node.putAll(Map map, boolean erase) method.
The thread safe way (at the moment) is to use a transaction.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4039436#4039436
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting
11 matches
Mail list logo
