Hi Jason,
Thanks for your response, I voted for it.
I'll just use a native database sequence for now.
Keep up the great work on JBoss/PojoCache it's a really great product. It
feels almost like magic when an object is automatically updated across the
cluster :)
many thanks
James
View t
In order for this use case to be truly atomic, you need a distributed
cluster-wide lock. JBoss Cache does not yet support an option for distributing
locking (instead locks are acquired when applying remote transaction batches),
mainly because distributed locking does not scale very well, and is
Anyone?
or is this not what PojoCache was intended for?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4076226#4076226
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4076226
__
