"mbroons" wrote : Can i use this pattern to provide some kind of highly available cluster ?
Yes. "mbroons" wrote : | I would have cluster A caches delegating to far cache A (inside the cluster A) | I would have cluster B caches delegating to far cache B (inside the cluster B) | | Can i set up something like: | | cluster A caches delegating to far cache A delegating to far cache B | cluster B caches delegating to far cache B delegating to far cache A | | there is cyclic dependency there. What will happen exactly ? Not a cyclic dependency, but far cache A and far cache B replicating to each other may cause issues. Why not just have something like: | Cluster A delegates to far cache A (FC-A) | Cluster B delegates to far cache B (FC-B) | | FC-A and FC-B are in their own, separate cluster replicating state between themselves. | This way, you still have 2 separate clusters (A and B) using far cache backends (FC-A and FC-B), and FC-A and FC-B are fail-safe since they back up to each other, and also cluster A and B can see the state in each other via the far caches. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4108034#4108034 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4108034 _______________________________________________ jboss-user mailing list jboss-user@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-user
