Isn't this a bug? Why should I annotate every parameters just to get a readable
name? Is there any better workaround for this, so that Java parameters name
directly got reflected to the generated wsdl without using @WebParam ?
View the original post :
Sun's reference implementation for JAX-WS behaves identically so it's not a bug
of JBossWS. It's inconvenient however and against the principle of sensible
defaults, like for example @WebService taking the annotated interface (or
class) name as the service name.
View the original post :
itsjewel wrote : Isn't this a bug?
This was a problem with Java 5 and before, the names assigned to parameters
were not retained in the resulting .class files when you compile the class -
this means at deployment time it is not possible to obtain the parameter name
using reflection.
The
Hi
i think the solution should be somewhat like
| @WebMethod
| public int addNumbers(
| @WebParam(name = myParamName1) int num1,
| @WebParam(name = myParamName2) int num2
| )
|
regards
Stefan Schueffler
View the original post :
That solution works perfectly, thank you for taking the time to respond.
- Ryan
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4134559#4134559
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4134559
