Thanks Ludwig, I will spend some time in looking at the patch over the weekend
probably.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4187200#4187200
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4187200
_
Glad that I could help.
Vicky: I've attached a diff-patch to the Issue.
Ludwig
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4187199#4187199
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4187199
__
Hi ludwig,
I've been using it for 3 days with around 20 queries per second without
problems.
Thanks a lot!
Best regards,
-rochi
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4187038#4187038
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=
"ladam" wrote : Hi,
| after I haven't heard something from Adrian I've filed it as a bug- please
find the reference @ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-6149.
|
Can you attach the "svn diff" for this patch, this issues is not given much
priority as the usage pattern you had been using
Hi,
after I haven't heard something from Adrian I've filed it as a bug- please find
the reference @ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-6149.
@rochi: I've also attached the patched WrapperDataSourceService for you, hope
that helps. We haven't yet tested in production, so please have a look
Hi Ludwig,
sounds good. If you want I can make some tests.
Best regards,
-rochi
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4184919#4184919
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4184919
_
Hi Rochi,
well, basically we are patching the WrapperDataSource.
This hasn't been done yet as I wanted to get some feedback first.
Once we've done that, we'll file a JIRA and provide a patch.
Best regards,
Ludwig
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&
Hi Ludwig,
we have exactly the same problem. How did you solved it?
Best regards,
-rochi
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4184668#4184668
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4184668
Hi Vicky,
sure.
The need for using remote data sources is more forced by our system environment
and the restrictions forced by our auditors than by the application design.
In our production environment we have a backend jboss that does a JMS-based
processing of incoming messages and is also han
"ladam" wrote :
| As we don't have the option not to use remote data sources for various
reasons, we
|
Can you let me know your use case ?
In a typical jee application using WrapperDatasourceService is not needed thus
it is stated as anti-pattern.
View the original post :
http://www.jbos
"ladam" wrote : ...we plan to patch WrapperDatasourceService to do a
connectionMethod.remove() in the doConnectionMethod()-function ...
|
Edit: Of course it should be connectionMap.remove() :-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4181380#4181380
Hello Vicky,
thanks for your reply.
That's the situation currently:
* We've confirmed on our side that the ungarbaged entries in the connectionMap
are definitely the cause of our growing heap dump
* After some intense searching I've found an old discussion around this
@https://jira.jboss.org/ji
Hello Ludwig.
"ladam" wrote : Before I file a issue in the jira / provide a patch I wanted to
post this here for any feedback because I am not sure if I fully understand the
functionalities involved here.
|
Did you got a chance to investigate the issue furthur, if so then update the
details
13 matches
Mail list logo
