[jboss-user] [Management, JMX/JBoss] - Re: Strange results with twiddle.sh when Jboss is down

2009-07-05 Thread delgurth
"bcosnefroy" wrote : Hi, | | Sorry to reply to my own topics... | | I've found how to solve my problem. | There is a jndi.properties file in the twiddle.jar file. | | In the jndi.properties file, I've added the line: | jnp.disableDiscovery=true | | Now when my Jboss server i

[jboss-user] [Management, JMX/JBoss] - Re: Strange results with twiddle.sh when Jboss is down

2006-11-29 Thread bcosnefroy
Hi, Sorry to reply to my own topics... I've found how to solve my problem. There is a jndi.properties file in the twiddle.jar file. In the jndi.properties file, I've added the line: jnp.disableDiscovery=true Now when my Jboss server is down, twiddle.sh returns an Exception. I still have to modi

[jboss-user] [Management, JMX/JBoss] - Re: Strange results with twiddle.sh when Jboss is down

2006-11-29 Thread bcosnefroy
Hi, It seems that I have to use the jndi option: jnp.disableDiscovery=true to disable the multicast. I wonder how to set this option without changing the Twiddle.java code. Should I create a jndi.properties file in the twiddle.jar or should I add a parameter to my java command line in the twid

[jboss-user] [Management, JMX/JBoss] - Re: Strange results with twiddle.sh when Jboss is down

2006-11-29 Thread bcosnefroy
Hi, Thanks Dimitris for your answer. I've search for the option but I can't find it. As you told me, in the org.jboss.console.twiddle.Twiddle.java, I can see: Properties props = new Properties(System.getProperties()); props.put(Context.PROVIDER_URL, serverURL); ctx = new InitialContext(

[jboss-user] [Management, JMX/JBoss] - Re: Strange results with twiddle.sh when Jboss is down

2006-11-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think it has to do with how the naming service is looked up. If it can't find it, it multicasts to the network to find the server. There is some option to turn this off, so you can search for it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3988398#3988398