So why does the AliasDeploymentDeployer add an attachment?
|protected static void addAliasComponent(DeploymentUnit unit,
NamedAliasMetaData alias)
|{
| DeploymentUnit component =
unit.addComponent(alias.getAliasValue().toString());
| component.addAttachment(NamedAlias
"alesj" wrote :
| Component deployers should only consume attachments,
| not create/generate them.
|
I wasn't aware of this. And given that the component deployers work on a
DeploymentUnit which provides the addAttachment API, i assumed that it would
behave the same as other deployers.
"jaikiran" wrote :
| So would that mean, the attachment generated by a component deployer is of
no pratical use to non-component deployers?
|
No, that's exactly what I'm trying to explain.
Component deployers should only consume attachments,
not create/generate them.
"jaikiran" wrote :
|
"alesj" wrote :
| Your #3 deployer is not a component deployer.
|
Just as a FYI - making my #3 deployer a component deployer did get it working.
The #3 deployer was give the chance of deploying the deployment.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic
"alesj" wrote :
|
| Your #3 deployer is not a component deployer.
|
That's correct.
"alesj" wrote :
| Your #2 puts attachment into component,
| hence it's only component deployers that can see that.
|
Any specific reason for this special treatment? Because after all that is a
si
"jaikiran" wrote :
| So the question is - what am i missing? :)
Your #3 deployer is not a component deployer.
Your #2 puts attachment into component,
hence it's only component deployers that can see that.
Component deployers should mostly consume attachments
not creating them - hence the name
So here's the real question :)
Do attachments to component contexts of an unit get treated the same way? Do
these attachments to component contexts get passed onto the deployers? From
what i see this is not the case.
Here's the example:
// This one doesn't do much and is not of much relevance
"jaikiran" wrote : anonymous wrote : So at a later point of time, will the
attachment of MyType be passed on to the available deployers?
|
| Yes it will.
|
Sure, that's the whole point of attachments.
"jaikiran" wrote :
| I did not put up my question correctly. Let me just debug throu
anonymous wrote : So at a later point of time, will the attachment of MyType be
passed on to the available deployers?
Yes it will.
I did not put up my question correctly. Let me just debug through the issue
that i am running into, before maybe posting the correct question.
View the original
