Thanks ... Look forward to that in the annotated format.
Actually, I find that a Lifecycle-Configure is probably the way to go, rather
than doing an .
One addendum, if somebody happens to try my code out, the aspect declaration
works better as:
|
|
|
|
| Life
"genman" wrote :
| One weakness is that the Name has to be stored in the target, there's no
way, given a Service to find its name in the Microcontainer. (That I know of.)
What can help is new stuff that I've added previous week:
|
|
This will 'inject' you underlying bean name.
View the
